Comparison of the minimal erythema dose for narrowband 311 nm UV-B and broad spectrum UV-B using a new UV device;Vergleich der minimalen erythemdosis von schmalspektrum-UV-B- und breitspektrum-UV-B-strahlern mit einem neuen UV-handgerät

Hautarzt

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 258-264

  Lehnen, M ^a   Koppermann, M ^a   Korber, A ^a   Grabbe, S ^a   Dissemond, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Broad spectrum; MED; Narrowband; Photo therapy; UV B

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIGHT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOTHERAPY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ULTRAVIOLET B RADIATION; ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIODERMATITIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SKIN; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; ULTRAVIOLET THERAPY;

EID: 16844383886     PISSN: 00178470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-004-0854-9     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Degitz K, Messer G, Plewig G, Rocken M (1998) Schmalspektrum-UV-B 311 nm versus Breitspektrum-UV-B: Neu Entwicklungen in der Phototherapie. Hautarzt 49:795-806
2. Fitzpatrick TB (1988) The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 124:869-871
3. Gloor M, Scherotzke A (2002) Age dependence of ultraviolet light-induced erythema following narrow-band UV-B exposure. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 124:869-871
4. Hofer A, Fink-Puches R, Kerl H, Wolf P (1998) Comparison of phototherapy with near vs. far erythemogenic doses of narrow-band ultraviolet B in patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 138:96-100
5. Hölzle E (2003) Empfehlungen zur Phototherapie und Photochemotherapie. Akt Dermatol 29:113-120
6. Hönigsmann H, Fritsch P, Jaschke E (1977) UV-Therapie der Psoriasis, Halbseitenvergleich zwischen oraler Photochemotherapie (PUV-A) und selektiver UV-Phototherapie (SUP). Z Hautkr 52:1078-1082
7. Hudson-Peacock MJ, Diffey BL, Farr PM (1996) Narrow-band UV-B phototherapy for severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 135:332
8. Karvonen J, Kokkonen EL, Ruotsalainen E (1989) 311 nm UV-B lamps in the treatment of psoriasis with the Ingram regimen. Acta Derm Venereol 69:82-85
9. Mahrle G, Schulze HJ, Steigleder GK (1985) Dithranol und kombinierte Behandlungsverfahren: Pro und Contra. Hautarzt 36:34-39
10. Njoo MD, Bos JD, Westerhof W (2000) Treatment of generalized vitiligo in children with narrow-band (TL-01) UV-B radiation. J Am Acad Dermatol 42:245-253
11. Parrish JA, Jaenicke KF (1981) Action spectrum for phototherapy of psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol 76:359-362
12. Storbeck K, Hölze E, Lehmann P et al. (1991) Die Wirksamkeit eines neuen Schmalspektrum-UV-B-Strahlers (Philips TL01/100 W, 311 nm) im Vergleich zur konventionellen UV-B-Phototherapie der Psoriasis. Z Hautkr 66:708-712
13. van Weelden H, De La Faille HB, Young E, van der Leun JC (1988) A new development in UV-B phototherapy of psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 119:11-19
14. Wainwright NJ, Dawe RS, Ferguson J (1998) Narrowband ultraviolet B (TL-01) phototherapy for psoriasis: which incremental regimen? Br J Dermatol 139:410-414
15. Walters IB, Burack LH, Coven TR et al. (1999) Suberythemogenic narrow-band UV-B is markedly more effective than conventional UV-B in treatment of psoriasis vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol 40:893-900