Molloy v Meier and the expanding standard of medical care: Implications for public health policy and practice

Public Health Reports

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 209-210

  Burke, Taylor ^b   Rosenbaum, Sara ^a  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COUNSELING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NEWBORN SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; STANDARD;

EID: 16844381834     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335490512000216     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. 679 N.W.2d 711 (Minn. 2004).
2. 679 N.W.2d 715 (Minn. 2004).
3. 679 N.W.2d 719 (Minn. 2004).
4. Molloy 679 N.W.2d at 719-20 (citing cases).
5. U.S. National Screening Status Report, National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center (updated 10/19/04). The National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center is a cooperative agreement between the Department of Health and Human Services, Maternal and Child Health Bureau and the University of Texas.
6. Newborn Screenings: The Characteristics of State Programs, U.S. General Accounting Office (March 2003).
7. March of Dimes Newborn Screening Tests, available at: URL: http://www.modimes.org/professionals/681_1200.asp
8. 42 U.S.C. §300b-8.
9. Munro v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 215 Cal.App.3d 977 (1989).
10. Safer v. Pack, 677 A.2d 1188 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996).