Impact of referral source and study applicants' preference for randomly assigned service on research enrollment, service engagement, and evaluative outcomes

American Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 162, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 781-787

  Macias, Cathaleene ^a   Barreira, Paul ^b   Hargreaves, William ^b   Bickman, Leonard ^b   Fisher, William ^b   Aronson, Elliot ^b  

^a MCLEAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; EMPLOYMENT; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; EMPLOYMENT, SUPPORTED; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCHER-SUBJECT RELATIONS; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 16844373758     PISSN: 0002953X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.781     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. New York, Houghton Mifflin, 2002
2. Krause MS, Howard KI: What random assignment does and does not do. J Clin Psychol 2003; 59:751-766
3. Calsyn R, Winter J, Morse G: Do consumers who have a choice of treatment have better outcomes? Community Ment Health J 2000; 36:149-160
4. Meyer B, Pilkonis PA, Krupnick JL, Egan MK, Simmens SJ, Sotsky SM: Treatment expectancies, patient alliance and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70:1051-1055
5. Shadish WR, Matt GE, Navarro AM, Phillips G: The effects of psychological therapies under clinically representative conditions: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 2000; 126:512-529
6. Kearney C, Silverman W: A critical review of pharmacotherapy for youth with anxiety disorders: things are not as they seem. J Anxiety Disord 1998; 12:83-102
7. Corrigan PW, Salzer MS: The conflict between random assignment and treatment preference: implications for internal validity. Eval Program Plann 2003; 26:109-121
8. Scholle SH, Peele PB, Kelleher KJ, Frank E, Jansen-McWilliams L, Kupfer DJ: Effect of different recruitment sources on the composition of a bipolar disorder case registry. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000; 35:220-227
9. Yeh M, McCabe K, Hurlburt M, Hough R, Hazen A, Culver S, Garland A, Landsverk J: Referral sources, diagnoses, and service types of youth in public outpatient mental health care: a focus on ethnic minorities. J Behav Health Serv Res 2002; 29:45-60
10. Bogenschutz MP, Siegfreid SL: Factors affecting engagement of dual diagnosis patients in outpatient treatment. Psychiatr Serv 1998; 49:1350-1352
11. Vanable PA, Carey MP, Carey K, Maisto S: Predictors of participation and attrition in a health promotion study involving psychiatric outpatients. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002; 70:362-368
12. Wahlbeck K, Tuunainen A, Ahokas A, Leucht S: Dropout rates in randomised antipsychotic drug trials. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 155:230-233
13. Hofmann SG, Barlow DH, Papp LA, Detweiler MF, Ray SE, Shear MK, Woods SW, German JM: Pretreatment attrition in a comparative treatment outcome study on panic disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155:43-47
14. West SG, Sagarin BJ: Participant selection and loss in randomized experiments, in Research Design: Donald Campbell's Legacy, vol II. Edited by Bickman L. Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage Publications, 2000, pp 117-154
15. Coo JA, Carey MA, Razzano L, Burke J, Blyler CR: The pioneer: the Employment Intervention Demonstration Program, in Conducting Multiple Site Evaluations in Real-World Settings, vol 94. Edited by Herrell JM, Straw RB. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 2002, pp 31-44
16. Stein LI, Test MA: Alternative to mental hospital treatment, I: conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980; 37:392-397
17. Allness D, Knoedler W: The PACT Model: A Manual for PACT Start-Up. Arlington, Va, National Alliance for the Mentally III, 1998
18. Russen MG, Frey JL: The PACT vocational model: a step into the future. Psychosocial Rehabilitation J 1991; 14:7-18
19. Anderson SB: We Are Not Alone: Fountain House and the Development of Clubhouse Culture. New York, Fountain House, 1998
20. Beard JH, Propst RN, Malamud TJ: The Fountain House model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation J 1982; 5:1-12
21. Propst R: Standards for clubhouse programs: why and how they were developed. Psychosocial Rehabilitation J 1992; 16:25-30
22. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW: Structured Clinical Interview for Axes I and II DSM-IV Disorders (SCID-P). New York, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department, 1996
23. Herinckx HA, Kinney RF, Clarke GN, Paulson RI: Assertive community treatment versus usual care in engaging and retaining clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48:1297-1306
24. Allison PD: Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Beverly Hills, Calif, Sage Publications, 1984
25. Brekke JS, Ansel M, Long J, Slade E, Weinstein M: Intensity and continuity of services and functional outcomes in the rehabilitation of persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 1999; 50:148-162
26. Macias C, DeCarlo L, Wang O, Frey J, Barreira P: Work interest as a predictor of competitive employment: policy implications for psychiatric rehabilitation. Adm Policy Ment Health 2001; 28:279-297
27. Chambless DL, Hollon SD: Defining empirically supported therapies. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998; 66:7-18
28. Lavori PW: Placebo control groups in randomized treatment trials: a statistician's perspective. Biol Psychiatry 2000; 47:717-723
29. Marcus SM: Assessing non-consent bias with parallel randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50:823-828
30. Lambert MF, Wood J: Incorporating patient preferences into randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53:163-166
31. Halpern SD: Prospective preference assessment: a method to enhance the ethics and efficiency of randomized controlled trials. Control Clin Trials 2002; 23:274-288