Statistical analysis of agreement in measurement comparison studies [9]

Eye

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 363-

  Patton, Niall ^a   Aslam, T ^a  

^a PRINCESS ALEXANDRA EYE PAVILION   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ANALYTICAL ERROR; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGITAL COMPUTER; EYE FUNDUS; FILM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 16844370409     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701487     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Musadiq M, Patsoura E, Hughes S, Yang YC. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems. Eye 2003; 17(5): 619-622.
2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1(8476): 307-310.
3. Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med 1989; 19(1): 61-70.
4. Gill JS, Zezulka AV, Beevers DG, Davies P. Relation between initial blood pressure and its fall with treatment. Lancet 1985; 1(8428): 567-569.
5. Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2002; 29(7): 527-536.