Assistant psychologists and their supervisors: Role or semantic confusion?

Clinical Psychology

Volumn , Issue 48, 2005, Pages 33-36

  Woodruff, Georgina ^a   Wang, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPETENCE; CONFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMPLOYEE; EMPLOYER; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; JOB ANALYSIS; JOB PERFORMANCE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGIST; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMANTICS; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 16844369726     PISSN: 14738279     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Division of Clinical Psychology. (1998). Guidelines for the employment of Assistant Psychologists. Leicester. British Psychological Society.
2. Goldstein, I.L. (1993). Training in organizations; Needs assessment, development and evaluation (3rd ed.) Pacific Grove, CA: Brookes/Cole.
3. Rezin, V. & Tucker, L. (1998). The uses and abuses of assistant psychologists: a national survey of case-load and supervision. Clinical Psychology Forum, 115, 37-42.
4. Truelove, S. (1995). The handbook of training and development (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Williams, W. (2001). Relevant experience: Alternatives to the assistant psychologist post? The Psychologist, 14(4), 188-189.