Obstruction alters the effect of prostaglandin E2 on ureteral contractility

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-187

  Lowry, Patrick S ^a   Jerde, Travis J ^a   Bjorling, Dale E ^b   Maskel, Jennifer L ^a   Nakada, Stephen Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUFFER; PROSTAGLANDIN E2;

ANIMAL EUTHANASIA; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG INHIBITION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTAGLANDIN RELEASE; SMOOTH MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; SMOOTH MUSCLE RELAXATION; SWINE; URETER; URETER OBSTRUCTION; URETER PERISTALSIS; URINARY TRACT OBSTRUCTION;

ANIMALS; DINOPROSTONE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE, SMOOTH; SWINE; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;

EID: 16844366787     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2005.19.183     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Gulmi FA, Felson D, Vaughn ED. Pathophysiology of Ureteral obstruction. In: Walsh PC, Rehk AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds): Campbell's Urology, ed. 8. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002, pp 411-462.
2. Laird JM, Roza C, Cervero F. Effects of artificial calculosis on rat ureter motility: Peripheral contribution to the pain of ureteric colic. Am J Physiol 1997;272:R1409-R1416.
3. Cole RS, Fry CH, Shuttleworth KE. The action of the prostaglandins on isolated human ureteric smooth muscle. Br J Urol 1988;61:19-26.
4. Cordwell WH, Larson TA, Lingeman JE, et al. Indomethacin suppositories versus IV titrated morphine for the treatment of ureteral colic. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:262-230.
5. Khater SH, Angelo-Khater M, Thulesius O, et al. The effect of indomethacin and metamizole on ureteral motility and urine flow in sheep. Urol Res 1990;18:435-438.
6. Basar I, Bircan K, Taser C., et al. Diclofenac sodium and spasmolytic drugs in the treatment of ureteral colic: A comparative study. Int Urol Nephrol 1991;23:227-230.
7. Foegh ML, and Ramvell PW. The eicosanoids: Prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, and related compounds. In: Katzung BG (ed): Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. New York: McGraw Hill, 2001, pp. 311-325.
8. Nakada SY, Jerde TJ, Jacobson LM, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is up-regulated in obstructed human ureter. J Urol 2002;168:1226-1229.
9. Jerde TJ, Maskel JL, Bjorling DE, et al. Effect of prostanoids on contractility on normal and chronically obstructed ureter [abstract] J Urol 2000;163:372.
10. Andersson KE, Forman A. Effects of prostaglandins on the smooth muscle of the urinary tract. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 1978;43(suppl 2):90-95.
11. Abrams PH, Feneley RC. The actions of prostaglandins on the smooth muscle of the human urinary tract in vitro. Br J Urol 1975;47:909-915.
12. Vermue NA, Den Hertog A. The action of prostaglandins on ureter smooth muscle of guinea-pig. Eur J Pharmacol 1987;142:163-167.
13. Jerde TJ, Saban R, Nakada SY. Evaluation of ureteric contraction: A comparison among ring, spiral-cut, and longitudinal segments. BJU Int 1999;83:95-100.
14. Van Rossum JM. Cumulative dose-response curve II: Techniques for the making of dose-response curves in isolated organs and in evaluating drug parameters. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1963;143:299-300.
15. Jerde TJ, Saban R, Bjorling DE, et al. Distribution of neuropeptides, histamine content, and inflammatory cells in the ureter. Urology 2000;56:173-178.
16. Anderson LE, Schultz MK, Wiltbank MC. Prostaglandin moieties that determine receptor binding specificity in the bovine corpus luteum. J Reprod Fertil 1999;116:133-141.
17. Coleman RA, Smith WL, Narumiya S. Classification of prostanoid receptors: Properties, distribution and structures of the receptors and their subtypes. Pharmacol Rev 1994;46:209-225.
18. Regan JW, Bailey TJ, Pepperl DJ, et al. Cloning of a novel human prostaglandin receptor with characteristics of the pharmacologically defined EP2 subtype. Mol Pharmacol 1994;46:213-220.