Effects of mounding on damage by the European pine weevil in planted norway spruce seedlings

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 154-161

  Heiskanen, Juha ^a   Viiri, Heli ^a  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Hylobius abietis; Picea abies; Plantation success; Site preparation

Indexed keywords

MIXING; PEST CONTROL;

HYLOBIUS ABIETIS; PLANTATION SUCCESS;

SEED;

MIXING; PEST CONTROL; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; PINUS; SEEDS; SITE PREPARATION;

CONIFEROPHYTA; HYLOBIUS ABIETIS; PICEA ABIES;

EID: 16844362311     PISSN: 07426348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/22.3.154     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. BERQUIST, J., AND G. ÖRLANDER. 1998. Browsing damage by roe deer on Norway spruce seedlings planted on clearcuts of different ages: 2. Effect of seedling vigour. For. Ecol. Manage. 105:295-302.
2. BJÖRKLUND, N., G. NORDLANDER, AND H. BYLUND. 2003. Host-plant acceptance on mineral soil and humus by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.). Agric. For. Ent. 5:61-65.
3. CAJANDER, A.K. 1949. Forest types and their significance. Acta For. Fenn. 56:1-71.
4. CHRISTIANSEN, E., AND A. BAKKE. 1968. Temperature preference in adults of Hylobius abietis L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), during feeding and oviposition. Z. Ang. Ent. 62:83-89.
5. FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE. 2002. Finnish statistical yearbook of forestry, Vantaa, Finland. 372 p.
6. GROSSNICKLE, S.C. 2000. Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: The performance of planted seedlings. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada. 409 p.
7. HAGNER, M., AND C. JONSSON. 1995. Survival after planting without soil preparation for pine and spruce seedlings protected from Hylobius abietis by physical and chemical shelters. Scand. J. For. Res. 10:225-234.
8. HANNERZ, M., Å. THORSÉN, S. MATTSSON, AND J. WESLIEN. 2002. Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to cuttings and seedlings of Norway spruce. For. Ecol. Manage. 160:11-17.
9. HEISKANEN, J. 2004. Effects of pre- and post-planting shading on growth of container Norway spruce seedlings. New For. 27:101-114.
10. HOSMER, D.W., AND S. LEMESHOW. 2000. Applied logistic regression, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 392 p.
11. KINDVALL, O., G. NORDLANDER, AND H. NORDENHEM. 2000. Movement behaviour of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis in relation to soil type: An arena experiment. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 95:53-61.
12. KINNUNEN, K. 1999. Tukkimiehentäin tuhojen kemiallinen ja mekaaninen torjunta. Metsätiet. Aikakausk. 4/1999:687-695. (In Finnish).
13. LÅNGSTRÖM, B. 1982. Abundance and seasonal activity of adult Hylobius-weevils in reforestation areas during first years following final felling. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 106:1-23.
14. LEATHER, S.R., K.R. DAY, AND A.N. SALISBURY. 1999. The biology and ecology of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A problem of dispersal? Bull. Entomol. Res. 89:3-16.
15. LINDSTRÖM, A., C. HELLQVIST, B. GYLDBERG, B. LANGSTRÖM, AND A. MATTSSON. 1986. Field performance of a protective collar against damage by Hylobius abietis. Scand. J. For. Res. 1:3-15.
16. LOF, M. 2000. Influence of patch scarification and insect herbivory on growth and survival in Fagus sylvatica L., Picea abies L. Karst, and Quercus robur L. seedlings following a Norway spruce forest. For. Ecol. Manage. 134:111-123.
17. MALIK, V., AND V.R. TIMMER. 1996. Growth, nutrient dynamics, and interspecific competition of nutrient-loaded black spruce seedlings on a boreal mixedwood site. Can. J. For. Res. 26:1651-1659.
18. NILSSON, U., AND G. ÖRLANDER. 1999. Vegetation management on grass-dominated clearcuts planted with Norway spruce in southern Sweden. Can. J. For. Res. 29:1015-1026.
19. ÖRLANDER, G., P. GEMMEL, AND J. HUNT. 1990. Site preparation: A Swedish overview. Forestry Canada, FRDA Rep. 105. 61 p.
20. ÖRLANDER, G., G. HALLSBY, P. GEMMEL, AND C. WILHELMSSON. 1998. Inverting improves establishment of Pinus contorta and Picea abies:10-Year results from a site preparation trial in northern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 13:160-168.
21. ÖRLANDER, G., AND U. NILSSON. 1999. Effect of reforestation methods on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scand. J. For. Res. 14:341-354.
22. PETERSSON, M., AND G. ÖRLANDER. 2003. Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage. Can. J. For. Res. 33:64-73.
23. SELANDER, J. 1993. Survival model for Pinus sylvestris seedlings at risk from Hylobius abietis. Scand. J. For. Res. 8:66-72.
24. SIIPILEHTO, J. 2001. Effect of weed control with fibre mulches and herbicides on the initial development of spruce, birch and aspen seedlings on abandoned farmland. Silva Fenn. 35:403-414.
25. SUNDKVIST, H. 1994. Extent and causes of mortality in Pinus sylvestris advance growth in Northern Sweden following overstorey removal. Scand. J. For. Res. 9:158-164.
26. SUTTON, R.F. 1993. Mounding site preparation: A review of European and North-American experience. New For. 7:151-192.
27. THORSEN, Å., S. MATTSSON, AND J. WESLIEN. 2001. Influence of stem diameter on the survival and growth of containerized Norway spruce seedlings attacked by pine weevils (Hylobius spp.). Scand. J. For. Res. 16:54-66.
28. VON SYDOW, F. 1997. Abundance of pine weevils (Hylobius abietis) and damage to conifer seedlings in relation to silvicultural practices. Scand. J. For. Res. 12:157-167.