Publish and perish: What constitutes a bar under the patent laws

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 1449-1450

  Teitelbaum, Rachel ^a   Cohen, Mark S ^a  

^a LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; PATENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

DOCUMENTATION; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LIABILITY, LEGAL; PATENTS; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 16644391310     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1104-1449     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. I.C.E. Corp. v. Armco Steel Corp., 250 F. Supp. 738, 743, 148 USPQ 537, 540 (SDNY 1966).
2. In re Wyer, 655 F.2d at 226, 210 USPQ at 794.
3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. AB Fortia, 774 F.2d 1104, 1109, 227 USPQ 428, 432 (Fed. Cir. 1985).
4. In re Carl F. Klopfenstein and John L. Brent, Jr., 03-1583 (regarding Serial No. 09/699,950), decided August 18, 2004.
5. In re Hall, 781 F.2d 897 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
6. Howmedica, 530 F. Supp. at 860.
7. Jockmus V. Leviton, 28 F.2d 812, 813-14 (2d Cir. 1928).
8. AT&T Corp. v. Microsoft Corp., 2004 US Dist. (SDNY, Feb. 18, 2004).