Value of subtraction in fat-saturated three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the hemodialysis fistula

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 608-615

  Takahashi, N ^a   Sato, M ^b   Niitsu, M ^b   Saida, Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography; Fat suppression; Hemodialysis fistula; Image subtraction

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESES; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MEDICAL IMAGING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; FAT SUPPRESSION; HEMODIALYSIS FISTULA; IMAGE SUBTRACTION;

OILS AND FATS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT; ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE SUBTRACTION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; ARTERIOVENOUS SHUNT, SURGICAL; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RENAL DIALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 16644387379     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850410001141     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adamis MK, Li W, Wielopolski PA, Kim D, Sax EJ, Kent KC, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional timeof-flight sequence. Radiology 1995;196:689-95.
2. Bos C, Smits JH, Zijlstra JJ, van Der Mark WA, Blankestijn PJ, Bakker CJ, et al. MRA of hemodialysis access grafts and fistulae using selective contrast injection and flow interruption. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:557-61.
3. Caputo GR, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance angiography and measurement of blood flow in the peripheral vessels. Invest Radiol 1992;27:S97-102.
4. Cavagna E, D'Andrea P, Schiavon F, Tarroni G. Failing hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula and percutaneous treatment: imaging with CT, MRI and digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2000;23:262-5.
5. Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD, Schindler N, Raviola CA, Ntoso A. Endovascular versus surgical treatment for thrombosed hemodialysis grafts: a prospective, randomized study. J Vase Surg 1999;30: 1016-23.
6. Ho KY, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: detection with subtracted and nonsubtracted MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:673-81.
7. Kelekis NL, Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S, Molina PL, Mauro MA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal aorta and iliac vessels using combined 3-D gadolinium-enhanced MRA and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:641-51.
8. Korosec FR, Mistretta CA. MR angiography: basic principles and theory. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:223-56.
9. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, Duber C, Krummenauer F, Kustner E, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:171-9.
10. Laissy JP, Menegazzo D, Debray MP, Loshkajian A, Viron B, Mignon F, et al. Failing arteriovenous hemodialysis fistulas: assessment with magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 1999;34:218-24.
11. Leiner T, de Weert TT, Nijenhuis RJ, Vasbinder GB, Kessels AG, Ho KY, et al. Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:724-33.
12. Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 1994; 191:155-64.
13. Schmalbrock P, Yuan C, Chakeres DW, Kohli J, Pelc NJ. Volume MR angiography: methods to achieve very short echo times. Radiology 1990;175:861-5.
14. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, Hayashi H, Hayashi K. Symptomatic peripheral vascular tree stenosis. Comparison of subtracted and nonsubtracted 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography with fat suppression. Acta Radiol 2000;41:133-8.
15. Sun Y, Parker DL. Performance analysis of maximum intensity projection algorithm for display of MRA images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999;18:1154-69.
16. Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW, Heisey DM, Korosec FR, Frayne R, et al. Time-resolved threedimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 2002;225:43-52.
17. Watanabe Y. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional angiography. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 2000;60:493-9.
18. Watanabe Y, Dohke M, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Ishimori T, Oda K, et al. Dynamic subtraction contrast-enhanced MR angiography: technique, clinical applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2000;20:135-52.
19. Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Ogata I, Takahashi M, Hiai Y. Three-dimensional high-resolution dynamic contrastenhanced MR angiography of the pelvis and lower extremities with use of a phased array coil and subtraction: diagnostic accuracy. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:1066-72.
20. Zhi-Pei Liang, Lauterbur P. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging. New York: IEEE Press; 2000. p. 258-9.