CT-based preoperative analysis of scapula morphology and glenohumeral joint geometry

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 264-268

  Welsch, Goetz ^a   Mamisch, Tallal Charles ^b   Kikinis, Ron ^a   Schmidt, Rainer ^b   Lang, Philipp ^a   Forst, Raimund ^b   Fitz, Wolfgang ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D; CT; glenohumeral joint; preoperative planning; scapula

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RADIOGRAPHY; SCAPULA; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SHOULDER; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SCAPULA; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SHOULDER JOINT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 16644386289     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929080309146062     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cutting C, Oliker A, Haring J, Dayan J, Smith D. Use of three-dimensional computer graphic animation to illustrate cleft lip and palate surgery. Comput Aided Surg 2002;7:326-331. (Pubitemid 36546243)
2. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Moller M, Ulmer S, Tomandl B, Fahlbusch R. Integration of functional magnetic resonance imaging supported by magneto-encephalography in functional neuronavigation. Neurosurgery 1999;44(6):1249-1255.
3. Richolt JA, Teschner M, Everett PC, Millis MB, Ki-kinis R. Impingement simulation of the hip in SCFE using 3D models. Comput Aided Surg 1999;4(3):144-151. (Pubitemid 29513088)
4. Sutherland CJ, Bresina SJ, Gayou DE. Use of general purpose mechanical computer assisted engineering software in orthopaedic surgical planning: advantages and limitations. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1994; 18(6):435-42.
5. Sugano N, Ohzono K, Nishii T, Haraguchi K, Sakai T, Ochi T. Computed-tomography-based computer preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 1998;3(6):320-324. (Pubitemid 29268753)
6. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Computer-assisted implantation of total knee prostheses: a case-control comparative study with classical instrumentation. Comput Aided Surg 2001;6(4):217-220. (Pubitemid 34118302)
7. Das SP, Ray GS, Saha AK. Observations on the tilt of the glenoid cavity of scapula. J Anat Soc India 1966; 15:114-118.
8. Gray DJ. Variations in human scapulae. Am J Phys Anthrop 1942;29:57-72.
9. Saha AK. Dynamic stability of the glenohumeral joint. Acta Orthop Scandinavica 1971;42:491-505.
10. Cyprien JM, Vasey HM, Brudet A, Bonvin JC, Krit-sikis N, Vuagnat P. Humeral retrotorsion and glenohumeral relationship in the normal shoulder and in recurrent anterior dislocation (scapulometry). Clin Orthop 1983;175:8-17. (Pubitemid 13093004)
11. Randelli M, Gambrioli PL. Glenohumeral osteometry by computed tomography in normal and unstable shoulders. Clin Orthop 1986;208:151-156. (Pubitemid 16049786)
12. Friedmann RJ, Hawthorne KB, Genez BM. The use of computerized tomography in the measurement of glenoid version. J Bone Joint Surgery Am 1992;74: 1032-1037.
13. Bokor DJ, O'Sullivan MD, Hazan GJ. Variability of measurement of glenoid version on computed tomography scan. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1999;8:595-598.
14. Skirving AP. Total shoulder arthroplasty-current problems and possible solutions. J Orthopaedic Sci 1999;4(l):42-53. (Pubitemid 29058549)
15. Heers G, Grifka J, An KN. Biomechanical considerations for shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopaede 2001 ;30: 346-353. (Pubitemid 32591803)
16. Helling HJ, Isenberg J, Andermahr J, Rehm KE. Minimally invasive surgery of glenoid fractures. Eur J Trauma 2002;28:257-251.
17. Schmidt HM, Vahlensieck M. Clinical and radiologic anatomy of the shoulder region. Radiologe 1996;36: 933-943.
18. Getz JD, Recht MP, Piraino DW, Schils JP, Latimer BM, Jellema LM, Obuchowski NA. Acromial morphology: Relation to sex, age, symmetry and subacromial enthesophytes. Radiology 1996;199:737-742. (Pubitemid 26157477)