The development of a short instrument to identify common unmet needs in older people in general practice

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 54, Issue 509, 2004, Pages 914-918

  Illiffe, Steve ^a   Lenihan, Penny ^a   Orrell, Martin ^b   Walters, Kate ^a   Drennan, Vari ^a   Thai, Sharon See ^a   Harris, Martin ^a   Kennedy, Horton ^a   Myerson, Sybll ^a   Blitz, Frances ^a   Cohen, Shoshana ^a   Labro, Trish ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consumer involvement; Elderly; Needs; Primary care

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ELDERLY CARE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

AGED; FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LONDON; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; URBAN HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 16644383950     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Williamson J, Stokoe IH, Gray S, et al. Old people at home: their unreported needs. Lancet 1964; 13: 1117-1120.
2. Iliffe S, Haines A, Gallivan S, et al. Assessment of elderly people in general practice. 2. Functional abilities and medical problems. Br J Gen Pract 1991; 41: 13-15.
3. Iliffe S, Gould MM, Wallace P. Assessment of older people in the community: lessons from Britain's '75 and over checks'. Rev Clin Gerontol 1999; 9: 305-316.
4. Stuck AE, Aronow HU, Steiner A, et al. A trial of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments for elderly people living in the community. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(18): 1184-1189.
5. Stuck AE, Siu LA, Wieland AG, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment. Lancet 1993; 342: 1032-1036.
6. Wilkieson CA, Campbell AM, McWhirter MF, et al. Standardisation of health assessments for patients aged 75 years and over: 3 years' experience in the Forth Valley Health Board. Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 307-308.
7. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health, 2001.
8. Walters K, Iliffe S. CANE in primary care settings: its feasibility and utility as a research and clinical tool. In: Orrell M, Hancock G (eds). Needs assessment in older people: the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. London: Gaskell, 2004.
9. Crome P, Phillipson C. Assessment of need. Age Ageing 2000; 29(6): 479-480.
10. May C, Gask L, Atkinson T, et al. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52(12): 1889-1901.
11. Pietroni P, Winkler F, Graham L. Cultural revolution. BMJ 2003; 326: 1304-1306.
12. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, et al. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ 2002; 325: 1263.
13. Andersson SJ, Lindberg G, Troein M. What shapes GPs' work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2002; 19(6): 623-631.
14. Andre M, Borgquist L, Foldevi M, Molstad S. Asking for 'rules of thumb': a way to discover tacit knowledge in general practice Fam Pract 2002; 19(6): 617-622.
15. Heathfield HA, Wyatt J. Philosophies for the design and development of clinical decision-support systems. Methods lnf Med 1993; 32(1): 1-8;9-17.
16. Amstein SR. Eight rungs on the ladder of citizen participation. In: Cahn ES, Passett BA. Citizen participation: effecting community change. New York: Praeger, 1971.
17. Audit Commission. Listen upl Effective community consultation. London: Audit Commission, 1999. www.auditcommission.gov.uk/reports/ ACREPORT.asp?CatlD=&ProdlD=EA01768C-AA8E-4a2f-99DB-83BB58790E34 (accessed 15 Oct 2004).
18. Milewa T, Valentine J, Calnan M. Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain's reformed health service: power and community in an era of decentralisation. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47(4): 507-517.
19. Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, et al. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review at the literature. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2(16): iii-ix;1-274.
20. Reynolds T, Thornicroft G, Abas M, et al. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE). Development, validity and reliability. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 444-452.
21. Walters K, Iliffe S, Tai SS, Orrell M. Assessing needs from patient, carer and professional perspectives: a feasibility study of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly in primary care. Age Ageing 2000; 29(6): 505-510.
22. Field E, Walker M, Orrell M. The needs of older people living in sheltered housing. In: Orrell M, Hancock G (eds). Needs assessment in older people: the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly. London: Gaskell, 2004.
23. Ashaye OA, Livingston G, Orrell MW. Does standardised needs assessment improve the outcome of psychiatric day hospital care for older people? A randomised controlled trial. Aging Ment Health 2003; 7(3): 195-199.
24. Martin MD, Hancock GA, Richardson B, et al. An evaluation of needs in elderly continuing-care settings. Int Psychogeriatr 2002; 14(4): 379-388.
25. Copley K. DETR index of deprivation 2000. North Somerset, Research and development Council. http://www.google.co.uk/ search?q=cache:QtPqbYD_8QJ:www.avon.nhs.uk/phnet/seminars/ Better%2520Health%2520Forum%252010.10.2002.pdf+%22DETR+index%22&hl= en&ie=UTF-8 (accessed 15 Oct 2004).
26. Dockery G. Rhetoric or reality? Participatory research in the National Health service, UK. In: De Koning K, Martin M (eds). Participatory research in health: issues and experiences. London: Zen Books, 1996.
27. Van den Van AH, Delbecq AL. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health 1972; 62: 337-342.
28. Carney O, Mclntosh J, Worth A. The use of the Nominal Group Technique in research with community nurses. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23(5): 1024-1029.
29. Bartunek JM, Murningham JK. The nominal group technique: expanding the basic procedure and underlying assumptions. Group and Organisation Studies 1984; 9: 417-432.
30. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5(5): 1-186.
31. Audit Commission. The coming of age; Improving care services for older people. London: Audit Commission, 1997.
32. Audit Commission. Forget me not: mental health services for older people. London: Audit Commission, 2000. Health service, UK. In: De Koning K, Martin M (eds). Participatory research in health: issues and experiences. London: Zen Books, 1996.