We need substantive criteria for decisions by children

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 8-9

  Frader, Joel E ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL CAPACITY; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;

EID: 16644376058     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651603322614391     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Fernandez, C. V. 2003. Context in shaping the ability of a child to assent to research. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(4):29–30.
2. Fisher, C. B. 2003. A goodness-of-fit ethic for child assent to nonbeneficial research. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(4):27–28.
3. Ladd, R. E. 2003. Child assent revisited. The American Journal of Bioethics 3(4):37–38.
4. Oberman, M., and J. Frader. 2003. Dying children and medical research: Access to clinical trials as bene. t and burden. American Journal of Law & Medicine 29(2–3):301–317.
5. Smith, M., M. Bernstein, W. A. Bleyer et al. 1998. Conduct of phase I trials in children with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 16(3): 966–78.
6. Wendler, D., and S. Shah. 2003. Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research? The American Journal of Bioethics 3(4):1–7.