Lifestyle screening: Development of an acceptable multi-item general practice tool

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 117, Issue 1205, 2004, Pages

  Goodyear Smith, Felicity ^a   Arroll, Bruce ^a   Sullivan, Sean ^b   Elley, C Raina ^c   Docherty, Barbara ^a   Janes, Ron ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b Abacus Counselling and Training Services Ltd   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^d New Zealand Institute of Rural Health   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUSE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANGER; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; DRUG MISUSE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; NEW ZEALAND; NURSE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RURAL AREA; SCREENING TEST; SMOKING; SOCIOECONOMICS; URBAN AREA; MENTAL DISEASE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADULT; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH; NEW ZEALAND; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 16644369249     PISSN: 11758716     EISSN: 11758716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Wennberg P, Escobar F, Espi F, et al. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): A psychometric evaluation. Reports from the Department of Psychology, U. Stockholm. No. 1996;811:1-14.
2. Lesieur HR, Blume SB. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:1184-8.
3. Salkind MR. Beck depression inventory in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1969;18:267-71.
4. Feldhaus K, Koziol-McLain J, Amsbury H, et al. Accuracy of 3 brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. JAMA. 1997;227:1347-61.
5. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J Marr Fam. 1979;41:75-88.
6. Norman P, Fitter M. The potential and limitations of opportunistic screening: data from a computer simulation of a general practice screening programme. Br J Gen Pract. 1991;41:188-91.
7. Smit HE, Herbert CP. Preventive practice among primary care physicians in British Columbia: relation to recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. CMAJ. 1993;149:1795-800.
8. Shepherd R-M. Clinical obstacles in administrating the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a methadone and alcohol clinic. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12:21-32.
9. Bradley F, Smith M, Long J, O'Dowd T. Reported frequency of domestic violence: cross sectional survey of women attending general practice. BMJ. 2002;324:1-6.
10. Brown JB, Lent B, Brett PJ, et al. Development of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool for use in family practice. Fam Med. 1996;28:422-8.
11. Caralis PV, Musialowski R. Women's experiences with domestic violence and their attitudes and expectations regarding medical care of abuse victims. South Med J. 1997;90:1075-80.
12. Friedman LS, Samet JH, Roberts MS, et al. Inquiry about victimization experiences. A survey of patient preferences and physician practices. Arch Int Med. 1992;152:1186-90.
13. Gielen AC, O'Campo PJ, Campbell JC, et al. Women's opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19:279-85.
14. Glass N, Dearwater S, Campbell J. Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments. J Emerg Med. 2001;27:141-9.
15. Hetrick S. Seeking help from the General Practitioner: experiences of women who have been abused [Master's thesis]. Auckland: University of Auckland; 1996.
16. Mazza D, Lawrence JM, Roberts GL, Knowlden SM. What can we do about domestic violence? Med J Aust. 2000;173:532-5.
17. McNutt L-A, Carlson BE, Rose IM, Robinson D. Partner violence intervention in the busy primary care environment. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:84-91.
18. Richardson J, Coid J, Petruckevitch A, et al. Identifying domestic violence: cross sectional study in primary care. BMJ. 2002;324:1-6.
19. Stenson K, Saarinen H, Heimer G, Sidenvall B. Women's attitudes to being asked about exposure to violence. Midwifery. 2001;17:2-10.
20. Ellis JM. Barriers to effective screening for domestic violence by registered nurses in the emergency department. Crit Care Nurs Q. 1999;22:27-41.
21. Richardson J, Feder G, Eldridge S, et al. Women who experience domestic violence and women survivors of childhood sexual abuse: a survey of health professionals' attitudes and clinical practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51:468-70.
22. Rodriguez MA, Bauer HM, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K. Screening and intervention for intimate partner abuse: practices and attitudes of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1999;282:468-74.
23. Sugg NK, Inui T. Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora's box. JAMA. 1992;267:3157-60.
24. Wilson JM, Jungler G. Principles and practice of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1968.
25. Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B. Screening for domestic violence in general practice: A way forward? Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:515-8.
26. Ramsay, Richardson J, Carter Y, et al. Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review. BMJ. 2002;325:1-13.
27. Ministry of Health. Family violence intervention guidelines: child and partner abuse. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2002. Available online. URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/ea6005dc347e7bd44c2566a40079ae6f/ a8de1720534369f6cc256c6d006eb15a?OpenDocument Accessed November 2004.
28. Elley C, Kerse N, Arroll B, Robinson E. Effectiveness of counselling patients on physical activity in general practice: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;326:793-6.
29. National Health and Medical Research Council. Draft clinical guidelines for weight control and obesity management in adults. In: National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia; 2002.
30. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Int Med. 1997;12:439-45.
31. Babor T, de la Fuente J, Saunders J. AUDIT - The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in Primary Health Care. In. WHO/PSA/92.4 ed: World Health Organization; 1992.
32. Maisto SA, Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Corroboration of drug abusers' self-reports through the use of multiple data sources. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1982;9:301-8.
33. Elman I, Krause S, Breiter HC, et al. The validity of self-reported drug use in non-treatment seeking individuals with cocaine dependence: correlation with biochemical assays. Am J Addict 2000;9:216-21.
34. Polich JM. The validity of self-reports in alcoholism research. Addict Behav. 1982;7:123-32.
35. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Prog Behav Modif. 1992;28:183-218.
36. Ministry of Health. The New Zealand Health Strategy. Wellington: Ministry of Health, Manatu Hauora; December 2000. Available online. URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/ea6005dc347e7bd44c2566a40079ae6f/ fb62475d5d911e88cc256d42007bd67e?OpenDocument Accessed November 2004.
37. Ministry of Health. National Alcohol Strategy 2000-2003. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2001. Available online. URL: http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/ea6005dc347e7bd44c2566a40079ae6f/ 2844f7e8856b21a14c256a51007258f3?OpenDocument Accessed November 2004.
38. Brown R, Leonard T, Saunders L. A two-item conjoint screen for alcohol and other drug problems. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14:95-106.
39. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA. 1994;272:1749-56.
40. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIMEMD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999;282:1737-44.