Federalism, electric industry restructuring, and the dormant commerce clause: Tampa Electric Co. v. Garcia and State restrictions on the development of merchant power plants

Natural Resources Journal

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 615-660

  Dennis, Jeffery S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEREGULATION; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; FEDERAL SYSTEM; LEGAL SYSTEM; POWER PLANT;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

GARCIA;

EID: 16544392740     PISSN: 00280739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Maryland Official Warns Merchant Generators, ENERGY DAILY, Feb. 28, 2002.
2. Phillip S. Cross, State PUCs Show Split Personality: While Electric Restructuring Pauses, Telecom Pushes Forward, PUB. UTIL. FORT., Feb. 15, 2003, at 10;
3. Kathleen Davis et al., Is Deregulation Dead?, ELEC. LIGHT & POWER, Feb. 2003, at 1;
4. Jeremy D. Oller & Donald A. Murray, Cascading Caution: California Crisis Delays Deregulation, PUB. UTIL. FORT., Sept. 1, 2001, at 52.
5. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity, at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/chg_str/regmap.html (last visited Apr. 22, 2003).
6. FRED BOSSELMAN, JIM ROSSI & JACQUELINE LANG WEAVER, ENERGY, ECONOMICS & THE ENVIRONMENT 654 (2000).
7. Jeffrey W. Meyers & Robert M. Lamkin, Chapter 52: Electricity, in 2 ENERGY LAW & TRANSACTIONS § 52.01[6] (David J. Muchow & William A. Mogel eds., 2001).
8. LEONARD S. HYMAN, AMERICA'S ELECTRIC UTILITIES: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE 4, 28-30 (5th ed. 1994).
9. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Electric Power Monthly: January 2003 1, available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/matrix96_2000.html.
10. Shelia S. Hollis et al., Chapter 3: Federal Regulation of Energy Transactions, in 1 ENERGY LAW & TRANSACTIONS § 3.03[1] (David J. Muchow & William A. Mogel eds., 1991).
11. Joseph P. Tomain, Electricity Industry Restructuring: A Case Study in Government Regulation, 33 TULSA L.J. 827, 834-35 (1998).
12. Suedeen G. Kelly, Electricity, in THE ENERGY LAW GROUP, ENERGY LAW & POLICY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY 12-29 (Rocky Mt. Min. L. Fdn. 2000).
13. Lynn R. Coleman & Matthew W.S. Estes, State Utility Commission Regulation of Energy Transactions, in 1 ENERGY LAW & TRANSACTIONS § 4.02 et seq. (David J. Muchow & William A. Mogel eds., 1991).
14. PETER FOX-PENNER, ELECTRIC UTILITY RESTRUCTURING: A GUIDE TO THE COMPETITIVE ERA 56 (1997).
15. Nicole Ostrow, Florida Regulators Probe Power Plant Bidding Process, S. FLA. SUN-SENTINEL, July 19, 2002;
16. Fla. PSC Studies Changing Electricity Bidding Process, PALM BEACH POST, Aug. 2, 2002;
17. Cherie Jacobs, Florida Regulators Seek Change in Power-Plant Bid Rule, TAMPA TRIB., Oct. 1, 2002.
18. Changes Made to Power Rules, ST. PETERSBURG TIMES, Jan. 4, 2003.
19. ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 317 (2001).
20. CRAIG R. DUCAT, 1 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: POWERS OF GOVERNMENT 465 (6th ed. 1996).
21. BORIS I. BITTKER, BITTKER ON THE REGULATION OF INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE § 6.06 (1999).
22. Michael B. Browde & Charles T. DuMars, State Taxation of Natural Resource Extraction and the Commerce Clause: Federalism's Modern Frontier, 60 OR. L. REV. 7, 30 (1981).
23. JOHN E. NOWAK & RONALD D. ROTUNDA, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW § 8.1 (5th ed. 1995);