Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: A comparison with hysteroscopy

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 183, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1405-1409

  Dalfó, Anna Roma ^a   Úbeda, Belen ^a   Úbeda, Alicia ^a   Monzón, Montse ^a   Rotger, Ramón ^a   Ramos, Rafael ^a   Palacio, Angel ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI DEXEUS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFERTILITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOMETRIUM; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRENATAL DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERUS CAVITY; ADHESION; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; ENDOMETRIUM HYPERPLASIA; FEMALE INFERTILITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; UTERUS; UTERUS CANCER; UTERUS DISEASE;

ADHESIONS; ADULT; ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY; HYSTEROSCOPY; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE DISEASES; UTERINE NEOPLASMS; UTERUS;

EID: 16544391488     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831405     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Brown SE, Coddington CC, Schnorr J, Toner J, Gibbons W, Oehninger S. Evaluation of outpatient hysteroscopy, saline infusion hysterosonography, and hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:1029-1034
2. Gaglione R, Valentini A, Pistilli E, Nuzzi NP. A comparison of hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;52:151-153
3. Golan A, Eilat E, Ron-El R, Herman A, Suffer Y, Bukovsky I. Hysteroscopy is superior to hysterosalpingography in infertility investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:654-656
4. Prevedourakis C, Loutradis D, Kalianidis C, Makris N, Aravantinos D. Hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in female infertility. Hum Reprod 1994;9:2353-2355
5. Jacques Barbot. Hysteroscopy and hysterography. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;22:591-602
6. Kessler I, Lancet M. Hysterography and hysteroscopy: a comparison. Fertil Steril 1986;46:709-710
7. Payez JA, Mutie G, Schneider PJ. The diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in infertility investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987;156:558-560
8. Preutthipan S, Linasmita V. A prospective comparative study between hysterosalpingography and hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine pathology in patients with infertility. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2003;29:33-37
9. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Causio F, Schonauer LM, Pinto V, Galantino P. Tolerability of the mini-pan-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography in an outpatient infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 2001;76:1048-1051
10. Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P, et al. Investigation of the infertile couple: a one-stop outpatient endoscopy-based approach. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1684-1687
11. Balmaceda JP, Ciuffardi I. Hysteroscopy and assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1995;22:507-518
12. Merviel P, Mergu JL, Sananes S, Antoine JM, Salat-Baroux J, Uzan S. Place de l'hystéroscopie dans le diagnostic et le traitement de l'infertilité. Presse Med 2000;29:1302-1310