|
Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 536-540
|
Colorectal cancer screening: a review of the evidence.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BARIUM SULFATE;
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
ENEMA;
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
HUMAN;
MASS SCREENING;
METHODOLOGY;
NURSE ATTITUDE;
OCCULT BLOOD;
ONCOLOGY NURSING;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SIGMOIDOSCOPY;
STANDARD;
BARIUM SULFATE;
COLONOSCOPY;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
ENEMA;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
HUMANS;
MASS SCREENING;
NURSE'S ROLE;
OCCULT BLOOD;
ONCOLOGIC NURSING;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
SIGMOIDOSCOPY;
|
EID: 16544382553
PISSN: 10921095
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1188/04.CJON.536-540 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (15)
|