|
Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 550-553
|
Is there logic behind fetal monitoring?
|
Author keywords
Deductive; Electronic fetal monitoring; Evidence based practice; History; Inductive; Logic; Reasoning
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CEREBRAL PALSY;
CESAREAN SECTION;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CLINICAL RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CULTURAL FACTOR;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE;
FETOSCOPY;
FETUS;
FETUS DISTRESS;
FETUS HEART RATE;
FETUS HYPOXIA;
FETUS MONITORING;
HISTORY;
HUMAN;
LAW SUIT;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LOGIC;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
META ANALYSIS;
NEGLIGENCE;
NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURY;
NEWBORN DEATH;
NURSING;
PERINATAL CARE;
PREMATURITY;
PULSE OXIMETRY;
SAFETY;
STILLBIRTH;
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;
CANADA;
COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS;
DELIVERY;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
LABOR;
LABOR COMPLICATION;
METHODOLOGY;
PREGNANCY;
REVIEW;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
CANADA;
DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC;
DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE;
FEMALE;
FETAL MONITORING;
HUMANS;
LABOR, OBSTETRIC;
OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS;
PREGNANCY;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 16544367737
PISSN: 08842175
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1177/0884217504268942 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (13)
|