|
|
|
Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1007-1048
|
|
Patient autonomy versus religious freedom: should state legislatures require Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ABORTIVE AGENT;
POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;
ARTICLE;
BENEFICENCE;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PREGNANCY;
PRIVATE HOSPITAL;
RAPE;
RELIGION;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
UNITED STATES;
UNWANTED PREGNANCY;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
RELIGIOUS APPROACH;
ABORTIFACIENT AGENTS;
BENEFICENCE;
CATHOLICISM;
CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FEMALE;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HOSPITALS, RELIGIOUS;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY, UNWANTED;
RAPE;
RELIGION AND MEDICINE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 16544366261
PISSN: 00430463
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
