Differences in fm100-hue test performance related to iris colour may be due to pupil size as well as presumed amounts of macular pigmentation

Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Volumn 87, Issue 4-5, 2004, Pages 322-325

  Dain, Stephen J ^a   Cassimaty, Vicky T ^a   Psarakis, Dean T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Asians; Caucasians; Colour vision; F m 100 hue test; Macular pigmentation; Pupil size; Tritan

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COLOR VISION; COLOR VISION TEST; EYE COLOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; IRIS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGMENTATION; PUPIL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ADULT; COLOR PERCEPTION; COLOR PERCEPTION TESTS; EYE COLOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRIS; MACULA LUTEA; MALE; PIGMENTATION; PUPIL; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 16544365501     PISSN: 08164622     EISSN: 14440938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2004.tb05061.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Snodderly DM, Brown PK, Delori FC, Auran J. The macular pigment. I. Absorbance spectra, localization and discrimination from other yellow pigments in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 660-673.
2. Snodderly D. M, Auran J, Delori FC. The macular pigment. II Spatial distribution in primate retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 674-684.
3. Bone RA, Sparrock JMB. Comparison of macular pigment densities in human eyes. Vision Res 1971; 11: 1057-1064.
4. Werner JS, Donnelly SK, Kliegl R. Aging and human macular pigment density. Vision Res 1987; 27: 257-268.
5. Moreland JD, Dain S. Macular pigment contributes to variance in 100 hue tests. In: Drum B, ed. Colour Vision Deficiencies XII. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995, p517-522.
6. Hammond BR Jr, Caruso-Avery M. Macular pigment optical density in a Southwestern sample. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1492-1497.
7. Woo GC, Lee M. Are ethnic differences in the F-M 100 scores related to macular pigmentation? Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85: 372-377.
8. Birch J. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2001.
9. Dain SJ, Pereira SM, Palmer B, Lewis P, Hammond T. Illuminance and the FM 100 hue test. In: Verriest G, ed. Colour Vision Deficiencies V: Chapter 3. Bristol: Adam Hilge; 1980, p162-163.
10. Pokorny J, Smith VC, Verriest G, Pinckers AJLG. Congenital and Acquired Colour Vision Defects. New York: Grune and Stratton; 1979.
11. Verriest G. Further studies on acquired deficiency of color discrimination, J Opt Soc Am 1963; 58: 185-195.
12. MIMS Annual 26th ed. MIMS Australia; 2002.
13. Farnsworth D. The Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test for the Examination of Colour Discrimination: Manual. Baltimore USA: Munsell Color Company; 1957.
14. Vingrys AJ, King-Smith PE. A quantitative scoring technique for panel test of colour vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29: 5063.
15. Dain SJ, Scase MO, Foster DH. An assessment of the 'mesopization' model of blueyellow colour vision defects. In: Drum B, ed. Colour Vision Deficiencies X. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991, p187-197.
16. Dain SJ, Birch J. An averaging method for interpretation of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test. I. Congenital colour vision defects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987; 7: 267280. (Pubitemid 17126938)
17. King-Smith PE. A modified scoring technique for color vision panel tests. Optom Vis Sci 1992; 69: 84s.
18. Verriest G, Van Laetham J, Uvijls A. A new assessment of the normal ranges of the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue Test scores. Am J Ophthalmol 1982; 93: 635-642.
19. Dain SJ. Skewness and transformations of Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test scores. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3473-3476.
20. Available from: URL: http://home.clara.net/sisa/bonhlp.htm.
21. Stiles WS, Crawford BH. The luminous efficiency of rays entering the eye pupil at different points. Proc Roy Soc B 1933; 112: 428-450.
22. Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliot DB, Phillips NJ. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35: 1132-1137.