Accuracy of rasterstereography versus radiography in idiopathic scoliosis after anterior correction and fusion

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 91, Issue , 2002, Pages 241-245

  Hackenberg, Lars ^a   Hierholzer, Eberhard ^a   Liljenqvist, Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COBB ANGLES; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENTS; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; RASTERSTEREOGRAPHS;

RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE FUSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TORSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINAL FUSION; TORSION;

EID: 16544365445     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-935-6-241     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. U. Liljenqvist, H. Halm, E. Hierholzer, B. Drerup, M. Weiland. Three-dimensional surface measurement of spinal deformities using video rasterstereography. Zeitschriftfur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete 1998; 136:57-64
2. B. Drerup, E. Hierholzer. Back shape measurement using video rasterstereography and three-dimensional reconstruction of spinal shape. Clinical Biomechanics 1994; 9:28-36
3. K. Zielke. Ventral derotation spondylodesis. Results of treatment in cases of idiopathic lumbar scoliosis. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete 1982; 120:320-329
4. H. Halm, U. Liljenqvist, T. Niemeyer, D. P. K. Chan, K. Zielke, W. Winkelmann. Halm-Zielke instrumentation for primary stable anterior scoliosis surgery: Operative technique and 2-year results in ten consecutive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients within a prospective clinical trail. EurOpean Spine Journal 1998; 7:429-434
5. M. Morin Doody, J. E. Lonstein, M. Stovall, D. G. Hacker, N. Luckyanov, C. E. Land. Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: Findings from the U. S. Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine 2000; 25:2052-2063
6. B. Drerup. Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. J. Biomechanics 1984; 17:923-935
7. B. Drerup. Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projection of the pedicles. J. Biomechanics 1985; 18:369-378
8. B. Drerup, E. Hierholzer. Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines-Part 1: Measurement of position and orientation of vertebrae and assessment of clinical shape parameters. J. Biomechanics 1992; 25:1357-1362
9. B. Drerup, E. Hierholzer. Evaluation of frontal radiographs of scoliotic spines-Part 2: Relations between lateral deviation, lateral tilt, axial rotation of vertebrae. J. Biomechanics 1992; 25:1443-1450
10. B. Drerup, E. Hierholzer. Description of scoliotic deformity by modulated sinusoidal functions. Three-dimensional Analysis of Spinal Deformities (ed. by D'Amico M, Merolli A, Santambrogio GC), IOS Press/Omsha Amsterdam/Tokyo 1995; 113-118
11. E. Hierholzer, L. Hackenberg. Three-dimensional shape analysis of the scoliotic spine using MR tomography and rasterstereography (this volume)