Combining the benefits of decision science and financial analysis in public health management: A county-specific budgeting and planning model

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 406-412

  Fos, Peter J ^a   Miller, Danny L ^b   Amy, Brian W ^b   Zuniga, Miguel A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

^b Mississippi State Department of Health   (United States)

^c TEXAS A AND M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

decision science; finance; public health

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BUDGET; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; UNITED STATES;

BUDGETS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; MISSISSIPPI; PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 16544362831     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: 15505022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200409000-00006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Marmagas SW, King LR, Chuk MG. Public health's response to a changed world: September 11, biological terrorism, and the development of an environmental health tracking network. American Journal of Public Health. 2003;93(8):1226-1230.
2. Reinke WA. An overview of the planning process. In: Reinke WA, ed. Health Planning for Effective Management. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
3. Koontz H, O'Donnell C, Weihrich H. Essentials of Management. 4th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1986.
4. House Bill 5144, Laws of 2003, Mississippi State Legislature. Jackson, Mississippi; 2003.
5. Association of State and Territorial Health Officers (ASTHO). 2002 Salary Survey of State and Territorial Health Officers. Washington, DC:ASTHO; 2002.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Consensus set of health status indicators for the general assessment of community health status: United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1991;40(27):E-1-E-3.
7. United Health Foundation (UHF). America's Health: State Health Ranking 2003 Edition. Minnetonka, MN: UHF; 2003.
8. Adams K, Corrigan JM, eds. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: The National Academics Press; 2003.
9. Public Health Foundation (PHF). Measuring Health Objectives and Indicators: 1997 State and Local Capacity Survey. Washington, DC: PHF; 1997.
10. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Public Health (KY-DPH). Consensus Set of Health Status Indicators: Kentucky, 1998. Lexington, KY: KY-DPH; 1998.
11. Stevens A, Gillam S. Health needs assessment: from theory to practice. British Medical Journal. 1998;316(7142):1448-1452.
12. Fos PJ, Zuniga MA. Assessment of primary care health care access status: an analytic technique for decision making. Health Care Management Science. 1996;2(4):229-238.
13. von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
14. Beinat E. Multi-criteria analysis for environment management. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 2001;10(2):51-56.
15. Yang T, Kuo C. A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operations Research. 2003;147(1):128-136.
16. Butler J, Morrice DJ, Mullarkey PW. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Management Science. 2001;47(6):800-816.
17. Morgan KM, DeKay ML, Fischbeck PS, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Florig HK. A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): evaluation of validity and agreement among risk managers. Risk Analysis. 2001;21(5):923-937.