Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with difference scores

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 277-283

  Jamieson, John ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA); Change; Difference scores; Measurement error

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ERROR; MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 16444387636     PISSN: 01678760     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Baldwin L., Medley D., MacDougall M. A comparison of covariance to within-class regression in the analysis of non-equivalent groups. J. Exp. Educ. 52:1984;68-76.
2. Cohen J., Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analyses for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed:1983;Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
3. Collins L.M. Is reliability obsolete? A commentary on 'Are simple gain scores obsolete?'. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 20:1996;289-292.
4. Cribbie R.A., Jamieson J. Structural equation models and the regression bias for measuring correlates of change. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 60:2000;893-907.
5. Cribbie, R.A., Jamieson, J., Decreases in posttest variance and the measurement of change, (submitted)
6. Cronbach L.J., Furby L. How should we measure 'change' - or should we? Psychol. Bull. 105:1970;68-80.
7. Huitema B.E. The Analysis of Covariance and Alternatives. 1980;Wiley, New York.
8. Jamieson J. Dealing with baseline differences: two principles and two dilemmas. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 31:1999;155-161.
9. Llabre M.M., Spitzer S.S., Saab P.G., Ironson G.H., Schneiderman N. The reliability and specificity of delta vs. residualized change as measures of cardiovascular reactivity to behavioral challenges. Psychophysiology. 28:1991;701-711.
10. Lord F.E. A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychol. Bull. 68:1967;304-305.
11. Miller G.A., Chapman J.P. Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 110:2001;40-48.
12. Raykov T. Structural models for studying correlates and predictors of change. Aust. J. Psychol. 44:1992;101-112.
13. Rogosa D.R. Myths about longitudinal research. Schaie K.W., Campbell R.T., Meredith W., Rawlings S.C. Methodological Issues in Aging Research. 1988;171-209 Springer, New York.
14. SAS Institute. SAS Procedures Guide. 3rd ed:1990;SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Version 6.
15. Schafer W.D. Analysis of pretest-posttest designs. Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev. 25:1992;2-4.
16. Williams R.H., Zimmerman D.W. Are simple gain scores obsolete? Appl. Psychol. Meas. 20:1996;59-69.