Module six: Special issues

Developing World Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 92-108

  Schneider, Benjamin ^a   Schüklenk, Udo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME; CONFIDENTIALITY; FORGERY; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFORMED CONSENT; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; REVIEW; SOCIOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AUTHORSHIP; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DISCLOSURE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; PLAGIARISM; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 16444381709     PISSN: 14718731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00104.x     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Available at: http://www.ostp.gov/html/001207_3.htm
2. World Medical Association. 2000. Declaration of Helsinki.
3. W.R. Bezwoda, L. Seymour & R.D. Dansey. High Dose Chemotherapy with Hempopoietic Rescue as Primary Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1995; 13: 2483-2489. Retracted in the Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 19: 2973.
4. W.R. Bezwoda, L. Seymour & R.D. Dansey. High Dose Chemotherapy with Hempopoietic Rescue as Primary Treatment for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1995; 13: 2483-2489. Retracted in the Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 19: 2973.
5. J. Sprague Jones. Disappointment and Deceit in High-Dose Chemotherapy Trials. Breast Cancer Action Newsletter 2000; 59. Available at: http://www.bcaction. org/Pages/SearchablePages/2000Newsletters/Newsletter059A. html
6. R.B. Weiss, R.M. Rifkin, F.M. Stewart, R.L. Theriault, L.A. Williams, A.A. Herman & R.A. Beveridge. High-dose Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer; an On-Site Review of the Bezwoda Study. Lancet 2000; 355: 999-103. P. Cleaton-Jones. Scientific Misconduct in a Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Trial: Response of the University of the Witwatersrand. Lancet 2000; 355: 1011-1012.
7. R.B. Weiss, R.M. Rifkin, F.M. Stewart, R.L. Theriault, L.A. Williams, A.A. Herman & R.A. Beveridge. High-dose Chemotherapy for High-Risk Primary Breast Cancer; an On-Site Review of the Bezwoda Study. Lancet 2000; 355: 999-103. P. Cleaton-Jones. Scientific Misconduct in a Breast Cancer Chemotherapy Trial: Response of the University of the Witwatersrand. Lancet 2000; 355: 1011-1012.
8. R.B. Weiss, G.G. Gill & C.A. Hudis. An On-Site Audit of South African Trial of High Dose Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer and Associated Publications. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001; 19: 2771-2779.
9. S. Evans. 1993. Statistical Aspects of the Detection of Fraud. In Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research. S. Lock & F. Wells, eds. London. BMJ Publishing Group: 61-74.
10. C. Elliott. Pharma Buys a Conscience. The American Prospect 2001; 12. Available at: http://www.prospect.org/print/V12/17/elliott-c.html
11. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Available at: http://www.icmje. org/index.html
12. M. Angell. Is Academic Medicine for Sale? The New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 342. Available at: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/342/ 20/1516
13. South African Department of Health. 2000. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa. Appendix E. Available at: http://196.36.153.56/doh/docs/policy/trials/trials_contents. html
14. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). 1991. International Guidelines for Ethical Review of Epidemiological Studies. Geneva. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/frame_1991_texts_of_guidelines. htm
15. American College of Epidemiology. January 2000. American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines. Available at: http://www.acepidemiology.org/ policystmts/EthicsGuide.htm
16. South African Department of Health. 2000. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa. Chapter 9.
17. South African Department of Health. 2000. Guidelines for Good Practice in the conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa.
18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, op. cit. note 9.
19. I b i d.
20. Medical Research Council of South Africa. 2002. Guidelines on Ethics for Medical Research: General Principles. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.za/ethics/ ethics.htm
21. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, op. cit. note 9.