Clinical application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to define the relationship between multiple synchronous tumors

Modern Pathology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 591-597

  Wa, Chrystal V ^a   DeVries, Sandy ^a   Chen, Yunn Yi ^a   Waldman, Frederic M ^b   Hwang, E Shelley ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Comparative genomic hybridization; Leiomyosarcoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCT; CANCER SURGERY; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENE LOSS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC SCREENING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; INVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA; LEIOMYOSARCOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MICRODISSECTION; MULTIPLE CANCER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SYMPTOM; THIGH;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LEIOMYOSARCOMA; NEOPLASMS, MULTIPLE PRIMARY; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; RECEPTORS, PROGESTERONE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 16444380716     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800332     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Waldman FM, DeVries S, Chew KL, et al. Chromosomal alterations in ductal carcinomas in situ and their in situ recurrences [In Process Citation]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:313-320.
2. Gong G, DeVries S, Chew KL, et al. Genetic changes in paired atypical and usual ductal hyperplasia of the breast by comparative genomic hybridization. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2410-2414.
3. Hwang ES, Nyante SJ, Chen YY, et al. Clonality of lobular carcinoma in situ and synchronous invasive lobular cancer. Cancer 2004;100:2562-2572.
4. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998;20:207-211.
5. Wilhelm M, Veltman JA, Olshen AB, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the differential diagnosis of renal cell cancer. Cancer Res 2002;62:957-960.
6. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10869-10874.
7. Linn SC, West RB, Pollack JR, et al. Gene expression patterns and gene copy number changes in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Am J Pathol 2003;163:2383-2395.
8. Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling. Nature 2000;403:503-511.
9. Otano-Joos M, Mechtersheimer G, Ohl S, et al. Detection of chromosomal imbalances in leiomyosarcoma by comparative genomic hybridization and interphase cytogenetics. Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000;90:86-92.
10. Derre J, Lagace R, Nicolas A, et al. Leiomyosarcomas and most malignant fibrous histiocytomas share very similar comparative genomic hybridization imbalances: an analysis of a series of 27 leiomyosarcomas. Lab Invest 2001;81:211-215.
11. El-Rifai W, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Knuutila S, et al. DNA copy number changes in development and progression in leiomyosarcomas of soft tissues. Am J Pathol 1998;153:985-990.
12. Parente F, Grosgeorge J, Coindre JM, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals novel chromosome deletions in 90 primary soft tissue tumors. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1999;115:89-95.
13. Wang R, Titley JC, Lu YJ, et al. Loss of 13q14-q21 and gain of 5p14-pter in the progression of leiomyosarcoma. Mod Pathol 2003;16:778-785.
14. Buerger H, Otterbach F, Simon R, et al. Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes. J Pathol 1999;189:521-526.
15. Buerger H, Schmidt H, Beckmann A, et al. Genetic characterisation of invasive breast cancer: a comparison of CGH and PCR based multiplex microsatellite analysis. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:836-840.
16. Nishizaki T, Chew K, Chu L, et al. Genetic alterations in lobular breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Int J Cancer 1997;74:513-517.
17. Pollack JR, Perou CM, Alizadeh AA, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat Genet 1999;23:41-46.
18. Thor AD, Eng C, Devries S, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast is associated with chromosome 8 abnormalities detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Pathol 2002;33:628-631.
19. Tirkkonen M, Tanner M, Karhu R, et al. Molecular cytogenetics of primary breast cancer by CGH. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1998;21:177-184.
20. Waldman FM, Hwang ES, Etzell J, et al. Genomic alterations in tubular breast carcinomas. Hum Pathol 2001;32:222-226.