One-view mammography combined with ultrasound mammography versus two-view mammography for examination of the female breast. A new concept for early detection of breast cancer;Die ein-ebenen-mammographie in kombination mit der mammasonographie versus zwei-ebenen-mammographie zur untersuchung der weiblichen brust. Neues konzept für die früherkennung von brustkrebs

Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 289-296

  Weining, C ^a   Weining Klemm, O ^a   Barth, V ^a,b  

^a Inst Mammadiagnostik I   (Germany)

^b Inst Mammadiagnostik I   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 16444370473     PISSN: 00165751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-837532     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin S et al. Efficacy of screening mammography - a metaanalysis. J Am Med Ass 1995; 273: 149-154
2. Wells J. Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1224
3. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L et al. Changes in five year breast cancer mortality in a breast screening program. Proc Natl Cancer Conf 1972; 7: 663-678
4. Tabar I, Gad A, Holmberg LH et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Workshop Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; Apr 13; 1 (8433) 829-832
5. Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 2679-2683
6. Kopans DB. The positive predictive value of mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 521-526
7. Day N, Warren R. Mammographic screening and mammographic patterns. Breast Cancer Res 2000; 2: 247-251
8. Lundgren B, Helleberg A. Single oblique-view mammography for periodic screening for breast cancer in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 68: 351-355
9. Lundgren B, Jakobsson S. Single-view mammography screening. Three-year follow-up of interval cancer cases. Radiology 1979; 130: 109-112
10. Lundgren B. Efficiency of single-view mammography: rate of interval cancer cases. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 799-803
11. Lundgren B. Population screening for breast cancer by single-view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden. J Natl Cancer Inst 1979; 62: 1373-1379
12. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 152-158
13. Blanks RG, Wallis MG, Moss SM. A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme. J Med Screen 1998; 5: 195-201
14. Warren RM, Duffy SW, Bashir S. The value of the second view in screening mammography. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 105-108
15. Schlecht I, Hadijuana J, Hosten N, Oellinger H, Minguillon C, Lichtenegger W, Felix R. Ultraschalluntersuchung der weiblichen Brust: Vergleich von 7,5 und 13 MHz. Akt Radiol 1996; 6: 69-73
16. Schnarkowski P, Schmidt D, Milz P, Keßler M, Reiser M. Vergleich zwischen herkömmlicher und hochauflösender Sonographie für die Diagnostik von Mammaläsionen. Ultraschall Med 1996; 17: 190-194
17. Marini C, Traino C, Cilotti A, Roncella M, Campori G, Bartolozzi C. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination. Radiol Med (Torino) 2003; 105: 17-26
18. Bassett LW, Gold RH. Breast radiography using the oblique projection. Radiology 1983; 149: 585-587
19. Huppe JR. The oblique mediolateral view of the breast. Radiologe 1977; 17: 206-210
20. Thurfjell E, Taube A, Tabar L. One- versus two-view mammography screening. A prospective population-based study. Acta Radiol 1994; 35: 340-344
21. Thurfjell E. Mammography screening methods and diagnostic results. Acta Radiol Suppl 1995; 395: 1-22
22. Thurfjell E. Mammography screening. One versus two views and independent double reading. Acta Radiol 1994; 35: 345-350
23. van Dijck JA, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH, Holland R. One-view versus two-view mammography in baseline screening for breast cancer: a review. Br J Radiol 1992; 65: 971-976
24. Wald NJ, Murphy P, Major P, Parkes C, Townsend J, Frost C. UKCCCR multicentre randomized controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening. Br Med J 1995; 311: 1189-1193
25. Warren RM, Duffy SW, Bashir S. The value of the second view in screening mammography. Br J Radiol 1996; 69: 105-108
26. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL. Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 941-948
27. Bock K, Duda VF, Ramaswamy A, Vetter N, Iwinska-Zelder J, Schulz KD. Multimodale Diagnostik invasiv-lobulärer Mammakarzinome. Ultraschall 2000
28. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dunser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 921-927
29. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shvcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR 2003; 181: 177-182
30. Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J. Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specifity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms. AJR 2003; 189: 935-940
31. Kaiser JS, Helvie MA, Blacklaw RL, Roubidoux MA. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection. Radiology 2002; 223: 839-844
32. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175
33. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, Berliere M, Vande Berg B, D'Hoore W, Maldague B. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: The importance of radiologic breast density. AJR 2003; 180: 1675-1679
34. Lister D, Evans AJ, Burrell HC, Blamey RW, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Kollias J. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps. Clin Radiol 1998; 53: 490-492
35. Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 109-114
36. Shetty MK, Shah YP, Sharman RS. Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 263-268; quiz 269-270
37. Luckey P, Bohnenkämper C, Peters R, Koch JA, Dall P, Bender HG, Beckmann MW, Mödder U. Wertigkeit von konventioneller Mammographie, Sonographie und MR-Mammographie bei der Detektion maligner Mammaläsionen. RoeFo 2001: V0 5.4
38. Soo MS, Rosen EL, Baker JA, Vo TT, Boyd BA. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 1167-1170
39. Rotten D, Levaillant JM. The value of ultrasonic examination to detect and diagnose breast carcinomas. Analysis of the results obtained in 125 tumors using radiographic and ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992; 2: 203-214
40. Schreer I. Sonographie in der Mammadiagnostik. Radiologie up2date 2003; 3: 161-172
41. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, Stavros AT, Kaske TI, Clark SB. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology 2001; 219: 186-191
42. Weining-Klemm O. Vergleich verschiedener Biopsiearten, Feinnadelaspirationscytologie (FNA), Feinnadelbiopsie (FNB) und Vakuumbiopsie (VB); Möglichkeit, Grenzen und Kosten. Tübingen: Univ.-Dissertation, 2004
43. Backe J. Der Stellenwert der Brustselbstuntersuchung in der Früherkennung des Mammakarzinoms. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2002; 62: 339-345
44. Fersis DN, Krieger M, Smyczek-Gargya B, Ruja A, Fournier D, Bastert G, Wallwiener D. Das Mammakarzinom bei der älteren Frau. Einflüsse der primären Therapie auf das Gesamtüberleben. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2002; 62: 1170-1174
45. Ohlinger R, Kraus RG, Oellig F, Schwesinger G, Schimming A, Köhler G. Diagnostische Wertigkeit von Palpation, Mammographie und Mammasonographie in der präoperativen Diagnostik des Mammakarzinoms. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2003; 63: 1246-1255