Identification of rehabilitation needs after a stroke: An exploratory study

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Talbot, Lise R ^a   Viscogliosi, Chantal ^a   Desrosiers, Johanne ^a   Vincent, Claude ^b   Rousseau, Jacqueline ^c   Robichaud, Line ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community reintegration; Disability; Impairment; Needs; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CASE REPORT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DATA ANALYSIS; EMOTION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; PATIENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESIDENTIAL CARE; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOLOGY; STROKE; AFTERCARE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMMUNITY CARE; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; ELDERLY CARE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AFTERCARE; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DATA COLLECTION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUEBEC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE;

EID: 16444367050     PISSN: 14777525     EISSN: 14777525     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-53     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ahmed S, Gordon C, Higgins J, McEwen S, Salbach N: Disablement following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1999, 21:258-268.
2. Lincoln NB, Gladman JRF, Berman P, Luther A, Challen K: Rehabilitation needs of community stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 1998, 20:457-463.
3. WHO Expert Committee on Medical Rehabilitation: Second report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1969, 419:1-23.
4. Leduc M: La clientèle ayant des troubles du langage et de la parole associés à une déficience physique. Bilan des services offerts par les CHSGS, CHR, CR, URFI et hôpitaux de jour de la région de Montréal-centre. Régie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-centre.
5. Le Vérificateur général du Québec: Rapport à l'assemblée nationale pour l'année 1999-2000. Tome I. Québec 2000.
6. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St-Michel G: Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res 1998, 21:127-141.
7. Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, St-Michel G, Dion SA: Conséquences sociales des déficiences et incapacités persistanteset significatives: approche conceptuelle et évaluation des situations de handicap. Handicap - revue de sciences humaines et sociales 1999, 84:61-78.
8. Wood PHN: Origins of the ICIDH. ICIDH International Network 1988, 2:.
9. Bradshaw J: The concept of social need. In Planning for social welfare, issues, models and tasks Edited by: Gilbert N, Specht H. NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1977:290-296.
10. Pineault R, Daveluy C: La planification de la santé Montréal: Agence D'arc Inc; 1986.
11. Trahan L, Bélanger L, Bolduc M: Une évaluation de la prestation de services dans les C.L.S.C. et les centres hospitaliers. Pour des services de qualité aux personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie. Québec: Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux. Direction générale 1993.
12. CQCIDIH: Classification québécoise. Processus de production du handicap. Réseau international sur le processus de production du handicap 1998.
13. Morgan DL, Krueger RA: Focus Group Kit Volume 1-6. Edited by: Jean A King. London: Sage; 1998.
14. Lewinter M, Mikkelsen S: Patients' experience of rehabilitation after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1995, 17:3-9.
15. Zwygart-Stauffacher M, Lindquist R, Savik K: Development of health care delivery systems that are sensitive to the needs of stroke survivors and their caregivers. Nurs Adm Q 2000, 24:33-42.
16. Brandriet LM, Lyons M, Bentley J: Perceived needs of poststroke elders following termination of home health services. Nurs Health Care 1994, 15:514-520.
17. Gauthier L: Comprendre le processus de fardeau subjectif. Master's thesis University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; 1995.
18. McLean J, Roper-Hall A, Mayer P, Main A: Services needs of stroke survivors and their informal carers: a pilot study. J Adv Nurs 1991, 16:559-564.
19. Duncan PW, Hoenig H, Samsa G, Hamilton B: Characterizing rehabilitation interventions. In Assessing medical rehabilitation practices: The promise of outcomes research Edited by: Furher MJ. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 1997.
20. Lui MH, MacKenzie AE: Chinese elderly patients' perceptions of their rehabilitation needs following a stroke. J Adv Nurs 1999, 30:391-400.
21. Asadi-Lari M, Packham C, Gray D: Need for redefining needs. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:34.