Interpreting DNAPL saturations in a laboratory-scale injection using one- and two-dimensional modeling of GPR Data

Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 159-169

  Johnson, Raymond H ^a   Poeter, Eileen P ^b,c  

^a DENVER FEDERAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^c CSM ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; PERMITTIVITY; SAND; SATURATION (MATERIALS COMPOSITION); SURVEYS;

GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS; QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION; SUBLAYERS;

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR SYSTEMS;

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; SATURATION;

EID: 16444366150     PISSN: 10693629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.2005.0011.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. American Society of Testing and Materials. 2002. Standard test methods for AC loss characteristics and permittivity (Dielectric Constant) of Solid Electrical Insulation, D 150-98. American Society of Testing and Materials.
2. Brewster, M.L., A.P. Annan, J.P. Greenhouse, B.H. Kueper, G.R. Olhoeft, J.D. Redman, and K.A. Sander. 1995. Observed migration of a controlled DNAPL release by geophysical methods. Ground Water 33, no. 6: 977-987.
3. Greenhouse, J., M. Brewster, G. Schneider, D. Redman, P. Annan, G. Olhoeft, J. Lucius, K. Sander, and A. Mazzella. 1993. Geophysics and solvents - The Borden experiment. The Leading Edge 12, no.4: 261-267.
4. Johnson, R.H., and E.P. Poeter. 2003a. Inverse multiphase flow simulation to evaluate conceptual models, estimate intrinsic permeabilities and identify bias in field data, for a field-scale DNAPL injection in Borden sand given time-lapse GPR, chap. 3. In Johnson, R.H. Characterization of Subsurface DNAPL Movement with Ground Penetrating Radar and Inverse Multiphase Flow Simulations. Ph.D. diss., Department of Geology and Geological Engineering,Colorado School of Mines, T-5771, 22-55.
5. Johnson, R.H., and E.P. Poeter. 2003b. Interpreting DNAPL saturations in a laboratory-scale injection with GPR data and direct core measurements. USGS Open-File Report 03-349 (http:// pubs.usgs.gov/of/2003/ofr-03-349/).
6. Lucius, J.E., and M.H. Powers. 1997. Multi-frequency GPR surveys. In Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems '97 Proceedings. 355-364. Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society.
7. Olhoeft, G.R. 1998. GRORADAR™ - Acquisition, processing, modeling and display of dispersive ground penetrating radar data: Version 03.99. Available at http://g-p-r.com/ (accessed August 1, 2003).
8. Powers, M.H. 1997. Modeling frequency-dependent GPR. The Leading Edge 16, no. 11: 1657-1662.
9. Powers, M.H. 1995. Dispersive ground penetrating radar modeling in 2D. Ph.D. diss., Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, T-4820.
10. Powers, M.H., and G.R. Olhoeft. 1995. GPRMODV2 - One-dimensional full waveform forward modeling of dispersive ground penetrating radar data: Version 2.0. USGS Open-File Report 95-58, +floppy diskette.
11. Sneddon, K.W., M.H. Powers, R.H. Johnson, and E.P. Poeter. 2002. Modeling GPR data to interpret porosity and DNAPL saturations for calibration of a 3-D multiphase flow simulation. USGS Open-File Report 02-451 (http://pubs.usgs.gov/ of/2002/ ofr-02-451/).