Module five: Implementation of ethics review

Developing World Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 73-91

  Dhai, Ames ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUDGET; CONFIDENTIALITY; INFORMED CONSENT; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SOUTH AFRICA; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS DATA MONITORING COMMITTEES; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEES AND CHARGES; GUIDELINES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; MULTICENTER STUDIES; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOUTH AFRICA;

EID: 16444365090     PISSN: 14718731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2005.00103.x     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. South African Department of Health. 2000. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa. South African Department of Health. 2003. Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Structures and Processes. Draft.
2. South African Department of Health. 2000. Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials in Human Participants in South Africa. South African Department of Health. 2003. Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Structures and Processes. Draft.
3. H.M. Christley. Conducting Clinical Trials in South Africa. Applied Clinical Trials 1998; 9: 56-59.
4. M. Joffe. Unpublished Research. Informal Survey of Pharmaceutical Industry Performed in September 2000. Wits Health Consortium (Pty) Ltd. (A wholly owned subsidiary of the University of the Witwatersrand.)
5. South African Department of Health, op. cit. note 1.
6. I b i d.
7. E.J. Emanuel, D. Wendler & G. Christine. What makes Clinical Research Ethical? JAMA 2000; 283: 2701-2711.
8. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
9. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
10. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
11. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
12. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
13. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
14. nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000.
15. Emanuel et al., op. cit. note 6.
16. I b i d.
17. I b i d.
18. World Health Organization. February 2002. Surveying and Evaluating Ethical Review Practices. TDR/PRD/ETHICS/2002.1. Geneva.
19. Medical Research Council of South Africa. 2002. Guidelines on Ethics for Medical Research: General Principles. Book I. Fourth edition.
20. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. April 18, 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research.
21. P. Cleaton-Jones. Scientific Misconduct in a Breast-Cancer Chemotherapy Trial: Response of University of the Witwatersrand. Lancet 2000; 255: 1011-1012.
22. South African Department of Health, op. cit. note 1.
23. National Health Bill. Government Gazette No. 23696 of 8 August, 2002.
24. Christley, op. cit. note 2.
25. The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). 2002. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/guidelines_nov_2002_blurb. htm
26. South African Department of Health, op. cit. note 1.
27. CIOMS, op. cit. note 18.
28. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002. The Ethics of Research Related to Health Care in Developing Countries.
29. CIOMS, op. cit. note 18.
30. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, op. cit. note 13.
31. World Medical Association, op. cit. note 7
32. International Review Board. Institutional Review Board Guidebook. Chapter 3: Basic IRB Review. Available at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/irb/ irb_chapter3.htmn
33. CIOMS, op. cit. note 18.
34. South African Department of Health, op. cit. note 1.
35. International Review Board, op. cit. note 25.
36. South African Department of Health, op. cit. note 1.
37. G.J. Annas. Ethics Committees: From Ethical Comfort to Ethical Cover. Hastings Center Report 1991; 21: 18-21. L. Francis. IRBs and Conflict of Interest. In Conflicts of Interests in Clinical Practice and Research. R.G. Spece, D.S. Shim & A.E. Buchanan, eds. New York. Oxford University Press: 418-436.
38. L. Francis. IRBs and Conflict of Interest. In Conflicts of Interests in Clinical Practice and Research. R.G. Spece, D.S. Shim & A.E. Buchanan, eds. New York. Oxford University Press: 418-436.
39. D.D. Federman, E.H. Kathi & L.L. Rodriguez, eds. 2002. Responsible Research. A Systems Approach to Protecting Research Participants. Washington. The National Academies Press.