Tribal nations, local governments, and regional pluralism in washington state: The swinomish approach in the skagit valley

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 81-96

  Zaferatos, Nicholas Christos ^a  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; LAND USE PLANNING; REGIONAL PLANNING;

NORTH AMERICA; SKAGIT VALLEY;

EID: 1642618406     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944360408976340     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Altshuler, A., and Zegans, M., 1990. Innovation and creativity:Comparisons between public management and private enterprise. Cities, 7 (1):16–24.
2. Altshuler, A. A., and Behn, R. D., eds. 1997. Innovation in American government:Challenges, opportunities and dilemmas, Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
3. Amir, S., 1976. Unequal development:An essay on the social formulations of peripheral capitalism, New York:Monthly Review Press. ‘Brian Pearce, Trans.’
4. Ausherman, L. P., 1989. Characteristics of an effective tribal environmental regulatory program:The perspective of the regulated community. Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation, 4B (1) n.p.
5. Ayer, M. F., 1991. Meaningful implementation of the government-to-government relationship between each Indian tribe and the United States:A concept paper, Washington, DC:National Indian Policy Center.
6. Baker, D. G., 1986. Native Americans in the twentieth century. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 10 (4):109–112.
7. Bardach, E., 1998. Getting agencies to work together:The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship, Washington, DC:Brookings Institution Press.
8. Bardach, E., 1994. Turf barriers to interagency collaboration in human services delivery, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Innovations in American Government Program. (Working Paper)
9. Barzelay, M., and Leone, R. A., 1987. Creating an innovative managerial culture:The Minnesota “STEP” strategy. Journal of State Government,:166–170.
10. 1989. Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Indian Nation 492 U.S. 408, 106 L. Ed. 2d 343, 109 S. Ct. 2994, 1989
11. Bunnell, G., 1997. Ways counties can improve inter-governmental cooperation in land use planning and growth management. Wisconsin Counties, March:37–40.
12. Churchill, W., 1991. American Indian self governance:Fact, fantasy, and prospects. Z Magazine, October
13. City of Anacortes. Skagit River water rights agreement, Mount Vernon, WA:Skagit County Board of Commissioners. Skagit County, Skagit Public Utility District, Swinomish Indian Tribe, Sauk Suiattle Indian Tribe, Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, & Washington Department of Ecology (1996)
14. Clow, R. L., 1991. Taxation and the preservation of tribal political and geographical autonomy. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 75 (2):37–62.
15. Cohen, F. G., 1986. Treaties on trial:The continuing controversy over Northwest Indian rights, Seattle:University of Washington Press.
16. Cohen, F. S., 1953. The erosion of Indian rights, 1950–1953:Case study in bureaucracy. Yale Law Journal, 62:348–361.
17. Cornell, S., 1984. Crisis and response in Indian-White relations:1960–1984. Social Problems, 32 (1):24–44.
18. Cornell, S., 1987. American Indians, American dreams, and the meaning of success. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 11 (4):59–70.
19. Cornell, S., and Kalt, J. P., 1990. Pathways from poverty:Economic development and institution building on American Indian reservations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 14 (1):89–125.
20. Cornell, S., and Kalt, J. P., eds. 1992. What can tribes do? Strategies and institutions in American Indian economic development, Los Angeles:University of California, American Indian Studies Center. (Manual and Handbook Series, no. 4)
21. Deloria, V., Jr. 1973. “ The Lummi Indian community:The fishermen of the Pacific Northwest ”. In American Indian Economic Development, Edited by:Stanley, S., 87–158. The Hague:Mouton.
22. Deloria, V., Jr. 1985. American Indian policy in the twentieth century, Norman:University of Oklahoma Press.
23. Deloria, V., Jr. and Lytle, C. M., 1984. The nations within:The past and future of American Indian sovereignty, New York:Knopf.
24. Doering, K., 1992. Cooperation and coordination between tribes and counties in Washington:A survey of planning department staffs, Seattle, WA:Northwest Renewable Resources Center.
25. Dufford, P. W., 1979. Water for non-Indians on the reservation:Checkerboard ownership and checkerboard jurisdiction. Gonzaga Law Review, 15:95–106.
26. Endreson, D. B. L., 1991. Resolving tribal-state conflicts, Washington, DC:National Indian Policy Center.
27. Fredericks, J., 1989. State regulation in Indian Country:The Supreme Court's marketing exemptions concept, a judicial sword through the heart of tribal self-determination. Montana Law Review, 50:49–63.
28. Frizzel, K., 1974. Evolution of jurisdiction in Indian country. Kansas Law Review, 22:341–352.
29. Goeppele, C., 1990. Solutions for uneasy neighbors:Regulating the reservation environment after Brendale v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of Yakima Indian Nation 109 S. Ct. 2994(1989). Washington Law Review 65(2), 417–436
30. Halbert, C. L., and Lee, K. N., 1990. The timber, fish and wildlife agreement:Implementing alternative dispute resolution in Washington State. Northwest Environmental Journal, 6:139–175.
31. Hall, T. D., 1987. Native Americans and incorporation:Patterns and problems. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 11 (2):1–30.
32. Hall, T. D., 1990. “ Patterns of Native American incorporation into state societies ”. In Public policy impacts on American Indian economic development, Edited by:Snipp, M. C., 23–38. Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press.
33. Howitt, A. M., and Bromling, C., 1998. Empirical research on innovation in state and local government:Prospects and problems, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Innovations in American Government Program. (Working Paper)
34. Johnson, L. B., 1968. Special message to the Congress on the problems of the American Indian:The forgotten American, Published Papers Part I, at 335 Washington, DC:Library of Congress. ‘Speech’
35. Johnson, R. Zoning for environmental protection on Indian reservations. Proceedings of the Second Annual Western Regional Law Symposium:Indian Tribes and the Environment. Seattle:University of Washington.
36. Jorgensen, J. G., 1986. Sovereignty and the structure of dependency at Northern Ute. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 10 (2):75–94.
37. Kauger, Y., Dubey, R. B., and Mankiller, W., 1990. Promoting effective state-tribal relations:A dialogue, Washington, DC:National Conference of State Legislatures.
38. Kim, Gobin?. Guy Madison v. Snohomish County; v. the Tulalip Tribe of Washington. (2002, September 18). No. 00–36031, D.C. No. CV-99–01432-RSL
39. Larsen, R. W., 1989. Skagit summit:A bridge of understanding. The Seattle Times, December 17:A21
40. Lester, D., 1986. The environment from an Indian perspective. Environmental Protection Agency Journal, 12 (1):1–6.
41. Miller, B., 1993. The press, the Boldt decision, and Indian-White relations. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 17 (2):75–97.
42. 1981. Montana v. United States 450 U.S. 544, 1981
43. Northwest Renewable Resources Center (NRRC). 1990. The Northwest Renewable Resources Center responds to “the new politics of natural resources.”. Northwest Environmental Journal, 6 (1):8–18.
44. NRRC. Working effectively at the local level:Tribal/county cooperation and coordination. Paper presented at Conference on Tribal/County Relations, Seattle.
45. NRRC. 1995. Tribal-county cooperation:Making it work at the local level. Cultural Survival, 1:1–4.
46. NRRC. 1997. Building bridges:A resource guide for tribal-county intergovernmental cooperation, Seattle, WA:Author.
47. Nye, J. S., Jr., Zelikow, P. D., and King, D. C., 1997. Why people don't trust government, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
48. O'Brien, S., 1986. The government to government and trust relationship:Conflicts and inconsistencies. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 10 (4):57–80.
49. O'Connell, M. P., The application of tribal and state laws such as zoning, water management, and hunting and fishing regulations on Indian reservations in Washington. Paper presented at the University of Washington School of Law Continuing Legal Education Seminar. Seattle. May.
50. Olson, M. B., 1990. “ The legal road to economic development:Fishing rights in Western Washington ”. In Public policy impacts on American Indian economic development, Edited by:Snipp, M. C., 77–112. Albuquerque:University of New Mexico Press.
51. Paddock, S., 1998. “ The changing world of Wisconsin local government ”. In The State of Wisconsin Blue Book, 1997–1998, 100–172. Madison:Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau.
52. Page, V., 1985. Reservation development in the United States:Peripherality in the core. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 9 (3):21–35.
53. Pirtle, Morisset, Schlosser and Ayer. 1992. Implications of the Brendale opinion:The Yakima zoning case, Seattle, WA:Author.
54. Reed, J. B., and Zelio, J. A., 1995. States and tribes:Building new traditions. Proceedings of National Conference of State Legislatures,:1–21.
55. Riffle, S., 2000. Top ten strategies for negotiating successful border agreements. Paper presented at Wisconsin City Managers Seminar. March92000, Oshkosh.
56. Roberts, N. A., 1975. A history of the Swinomish tribal community, Seattle:University of Washington. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
57. Royster, J. B., and Fausett, R. S. A., 1981. Control of the reservation environment:Tribal primacy, federal delegation, and the limits of state intrusion. Washington Law Review, 64:581–594.
58. Ryser, R. C., 1992. Anti-Indian movement on the tribal frontier, Kenmore, WA:Center for World Indigenous Studies. (Occasional Paper 16)
59. Sanders, A. H., and Otsea, R. L., Jr. 1982. Protecting Indian natural resources:A manual for lawyers representing Indian tribes or tribal members, Boulder, CO:Native American Rights Fund.
60. Scott, J. E., 1984. Controlling land use on the checkerboard:The zoning powers of Indian tribes after. Montana v. United States. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 9:267–275.
61. Skagit County. 1984. Skagit County coordinated water systems plan, Mount Vernon, WA:Skagit County Health Department.
62. State of Washington. 1967. Inter-local government cooperation act RCW 39.34.010
63. State of Washington. 1977. Washington State water coordinating act RCW 70.116
64. State of Washington. 1978. Transportation guide for Indian tribal governments, Olympia:Washington Department of Transportation.
65. State of Washington, Department of Ecology v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1985a. 752 F.2d 1465, 9th Cir. 1985
66. State of Washington. 1985b. The State of Washington and Indian tribes, Olympia, WA:Office of the Attorney General, Indian Litigation Coordinating Committee.
67. State of Washington. 1987. Timber, fish and wildlife (TFW) agreement:A better future in our woods and streams, Olympia:Washington Department of Natural Resources, Forest Regulation and Assistance Division. (Final Report)
68. State of Washington. January 3 1989a. Governor's proclamation on tribal relations, January 3, Olympia, WA:Office of the Governor.
69. State of Washington. 1989b. Centennial accord, Olympia, WA:Office of the Governor.
70. State of Washington. 1990a. Growth management act ESHB 2929, Revised Code of Washington 36.70A
71. State of Washington. 1990b. State tribal relations training manual, Olympia, WA:Governor's Office of Indian Affairs.
72. State of Washington. 1991. Department of Natural Resources tribal policy, Olympia:Washington Department of Natural Resources.
73. Sutton, I., 1975. Indian land tenure:Bibliographical essays and a guide to the literature, New York:Clearwater.
74. Sutton, I., 1991. The political geography of Indian country:An introduction. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 15 (2):3–35.
75. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. 1989. Draft Swinomish comprehensive plan, LaConner, WA:Swinomish Office of Planning and Community Development.
76. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. 1995. Swinomish water code ‘Ordinance’, LaConner, WA:Swinomish Office of Planning and Community Development.
77. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community & Skagit County, WA. March 17 1987. Memorandum of understanding for establishing a tribal-county regional planning program, March 17, LaConner, WA:Swinomish Office of Planning and Community Development.
78. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community & Skagit County, WA. September 19 1996. Memorandum of understanding for implementing a coordinated land use policy, September 19, LaConner, WA:Swinomish Office of Planning and Community Development.
79. U.S. Census Bureau. 2000. Profile of general demographic characteristics, Washington, DC:Author. (Summary File 1, 100-Percent Data, for American Indian Reservation areas)
80. U.S. Congress. 1887. General allotment act ‘Dawes Act’. 25 USC, Sec. 332–334, 339, 341, 348, 349, 354, 381
81. U.S. Congress. 1975. Indian self-determination and education assistance act of 1975 25 U.S.C Sec. 450, Pub. L. 93–638
82. U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Interior Board of Indian Appeals. 1999. Washington, DC:Author. Docket No. IBIA 02–1002-A
83. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ‘USEPA’. 1984. Indian policy implementation guidance, Washington, DC:Author.
84. U.S. v. Washington. 1974. 384 F. Supp. 312, W.D., Wash., 1974. Aff d, 520 F. 2d. 676, 9th Cir., Cert denied, 423 U.S. 1086, 1976
85. Weaver, T., 1990. Brendale:Checkerboards, land and civil authority. Paper presented at Washington State Bar Association Symposium, Indian Law Section. May1990, Seattle.
86. Winchell, D. G., 1995. Tribal sovereignty as the basis for tribal planning. Indigenous Planners, 1:1–4.
87. Zegans, M., 1990. Innovations and the municipal attorney:Managing the tension between service and control, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Innovations in American Government Program. (Working Paper)