Comparison of two methods of treatment for intraluminal thermal ablation using an ultrasound cylindrical phased array

Ultrasonics

Volumn 42, Issue 1-9, 2004, Pages 937-942

  Melodelima, David ^a   Prat, Frédéric ^b   Birer, Alain ^a   Theillère, Yves ^a   Cathignol, Dominique ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

High intensity ultrasound; Intraluminal; Phased array; Plane waves

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA PHASED ARRAYS; APPLICATORS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; FREQUENCIES; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; SURGERY; ULTRASONIC PROPAGATION; ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCERS;

HIGH INTENSITY ULTRASOUND; INTRALUMINAL; PLANE WAVES;

ULTRASONICS;

WATER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYPERTHERMIC THERAPY; IN VITRO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; LIVER TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; NECROSIS; SWINE; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

ANIMALS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HYPERTHERMIA, INDUCED; LIVER NEOPLASMS; NECROSIS; SWINE; ULTRASONIC THERAPY; WATER;

EID: 1642601600     PISSN: 0041624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.088     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Hutchinson E.B., Buchanan M.T., Hynynen K. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Control. 43:1996;1032-1042.
2. Cain C.A., Umemura S.I. Concentric-ring and sector-vortex phased-array applicators for ultrasound hyperthermia. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 44:1999;1803-1813.
3. Chopra R., Bronskill M.J., Foster F.S. Feasibility of linear arrays for interstitial ultrasound thermal therapy. Med. Phys. 27:2000;1281-1286.
4. Curiel L., et al. 1.5-D high intensity focused ultrasound array for non-invasive prostate cancer surgery. IEEE UFF Control. 49:2002;231-242.
5. Fan X., Hynynen K. A study of various parameters of spherically curved phased arrays for noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Phys. Med. Biol. 41:1996;591-608.
6. O'Neil H.T. Theory of focusing radiators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21:1949;516-526.
7. Cathignol D., Sapozhnikov O., Zhang J. Lamb waves in piezoelectric focused radiator as a reason for discrepancy between O'Neils formula and experiment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;1286-1297.