Exploring roles for the UML diagrams in software performance engineering

Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Research and Practise

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 43-47

  Merseguer, José ^a   Campos, Javier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Software design; Software performance engineering; UML

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY OF SERVICE; ROUTERS;

SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING (SPE);

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 1642587892     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. S. Bernardi, S. Donatelli, and J. Merseguer, From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable Petri net models, in Inverardi et al. [6], ISBN 1-58113-563-7, pp. 35-45.
2. V. Cortellessa and R. Mirandola, Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams, in Woodside et al. [15], ISBN 1-58113-195-x, pp. 58-70.
3. M. de Miguel, T. Lambolais, M. Hannouz, S. Betge, and S. Piekarec, UML extensions for the specification of latency constraints in architectural models, in Woodside et al. [15], ISBN 1-58113-195-x, pp. 83-88.
4. F. DiCesare, G. Harhalakis, J. M. Proth, M. Silva, and F.B. Vernadat, Practice of Petri nets in manufacturing, Chapman & Hall, London, 1993.
5. E. Domínguez, A.L. Rubio, and M.A. Zapata, Dynamic semantics of UML state machines: A metamodelling perspectiv, Journal of Database Management 13 (2002), 20-38.
6. P. Inverardi, S. Balsamo, and Selic B. (eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Software and Performance, Rome, Italy, ACM, July 24-26 2002, ISBN 1-58113-563-7.
7. C. Juiz, R. Puigjaner, and K. Jackson, Performance modelling of interaction protocols in soft real-time design architectures, Performance Engineering. State of the Art and Current Trends, LNCS vol. 2047, Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp. 300-316.
8. J.L. Medina, M. Gonzalez, and J.M. Drake, MAST real-time view: A graphic UML tool for modeling object-oriented real-time systems, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 2001) (London, UK), IEEE Computer Society Press, December 2001, pp. 245-256.
9. J. Merseguer, Software performance engineering based on UML and Petri nets, Ph.D. thesis, University of Zaragoza, Spain, March 2003.
10. J. Merseguer, S. Bernardi, J. Campos, and S. Donatelli, A compositional semantics for UML state machines aimed at performance evaluation, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Discrete Event Systems (Zaragoza, Spain) (A. Giua and M. Silva, eds.), IEEE Computer Society Press, October 2002, pp. 295-302.
11. J. Merseguer, J. Campos, and E. Mena, Analysing internet software retrieval systems: Modeling and performance comparison, Wireless Networks (WINET) 9 (2003), no. 3, 223-238.
12. Object Management Group, http:/www.omg.org, OMG Unified Modeling Language specification, September 2001, version 1.4.
13. Object Management Group, http:/www.omg.org, UML Profile for Schedulabibity, Performance and Time Specification, March 2002.
14. C.U. Smith, M. Woodside, and P. Clements (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Software and Performance, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, ACM, October 12-16 1998, ISBN 1-58113-060-0.
15. M. Woodside, H. Gomaa, and D. Menascé (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Software and Performance, Ottawa, Canada, ACM, September 17-20 2000, ISBN 1-58113-195-x.