A bias analysis of Weibull models under heaped data

Statistical Papers

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 211-229

  Augustin, Thomas ^a   Wolff, Joachim ^b  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Duration models; Heaping; Measurement error modelling; Response variable error; Socio economic panel; Survey design

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642587096     PISSN: 09325026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02777224     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. BIEMER, P. P., GROVES, R. M., LYBERG, L. E., MATHIOWETZ, L. E., and SUDMAN, S. (eds.) (1991). Measurement Errors in Surveys. Wiley. New York. 665-685.
2. 4). Econometric Analysis. MacMillan, New York.
3. KRAUS, F. and STEINER, V. (1998). Modelling heaping effects in unemployment duration models - with an application to retrospective event data in the German Socio-Economic Panel. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik. 217, 550-573.
4. LANCASTER, T. (1990). The Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. SKINNER, C. J., and HUMPHREYS, K. (1999). Weibull regression for lifetimes measured with error. Lifetime Data Analysis 5, 23-37.
6. TORELLI, N. and TRIVELLATO, U. (1993). Modelling inaccuracies in job-search duration data. Journal of Econometrics 59, pp. 187-211.
7. WOLFF, J. (1998). Essays in Unemployment Duration in two Economies in Transition: East Germany and Hungary. Ph.D.-Thesis, European University Institute, Florence.