Calibrated peer review™ and assessing learning outcomes

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages

  Carlson, Patricia A ^a   Berry, Frederick C ^a  

^a ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Cognitive growth; Peer review; Web delivered instructional software; Writing in the disciplines

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE GROWTH; PEER REVIEW; WEB DELIVERED INSTRUCTIONAL SOFTWARE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STUDENTS; TEACHING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 1642560866     PISSN: 01905848     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Chapman, O. L. and M. A. Fiore. "Calibrated Peer Review™," Journal of Interactive Instruction Development Winter 2000, pp. 11-15.
2. S warts, J. and L. Odell. "Rethinking the Evaluation of Writing in Engineering Courses," Proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001, pp. TCA-25 - 30.
3. Driskill, L. "Linking Industry Best Practices and EC3(g) Assessment in Engineering Communication," Proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2000. Available: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/̃engicomm/public/Driskill.html
4. Emig, J. "Writing as a Mode of Learning," College Composition and Communication. Vol. 28, 1977, pp. 122-128.
5. Hansen, K., R. T. Scribner, and E. Asplund. "Annotated Bibliography: Using Writing to Enhance Learning," Brigham Young Unversity. Available: http://saugus.bvu.edu/Writing/bibliography.htm
6. Robinson, R. "An Application to Increase Student Reading & Writing Skills," The American Biology Teacher, Vol. 63, No 7. September 2001, pp. 474-480.
7. Vygotsky, L. Thought and Language. Eugenia Hanfmann & Gertrude Vakar (Trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
8. Bloom, B., M. Englehart, E. Furst, W. Hill, and D. Krathwohl. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans-Green, 1956.
9. Perry. W. "Cognitive and Ethical Growth: The Making of Meaning," In A. W. Chickering et al. (Eds.), The Modern American College, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
10. Irish, R. "Engineering Thinking: Using Benjamin Bloom and William Perry to Design Assignments," Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 83-102.
11. Eschenback, E. A. "Improving Technical Writing via Web-Based Peer Review of Final Reports," Proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001, pp. F3A1 -5.
12. Sharp, J.E., B. M. Olds, R. L. Miller, and M. A. Dyrud, "Four Effective Writing Strategies for Engineering Classes," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 88, No. 1, January 1999, pp. 53-57.
13. Yancey, K. B. "Looking Back as We Look Forward: Historicizing Writing Assessment," College Composition and Communication, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 483-503.
14. Carlson, P. and M. Slaven. "Hypertext Tools: The Next Frontier: Tools that Teach," Information Systems Management, Vol. 9, No. 2, Spring 1992, pp. 53-61.
15. Allen, J. "The Role(s) of Assessment in Technical Communication: A Review of the Literature." Technical Communication Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1993, pp. 365-388.
16. Heinricher, A.C., J. E. Miller, L. Schachterle, N.K. Kildahl, and V. Bluemel. "Undergraduate Learning Portfolios for Institutional Assessment," Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 91, No. 2, April 2002, pp. 249-253.
17. Zuboff, S. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York: Basic Books, 1988.