Comparison of type I error rates for statistical analyses of resource selection

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 206-212

  Bingham, Ralph L ^a   Brennan, Leonard A ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Compositional analysis; Euclidean distance; Known parameters; Monte Carlo simulations; Resource selection analysis; Type I error rate

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; HABITAT SELECTION; RESOURCE SELECTION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 1642558410     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0206:COTIER]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AEBISCHER, N. J., P. A. ROBERTSON, AND R. E. KENWARD. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313-1325.
2. AITCHISON, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom.
3. BEIER, P., AND J. E. DRENNAN. 1997. Forest structure and prey abundance in foraging areas of northern goshawks. Ecological Applications 7:564-571.
4. CARROLL, J. P., R. D. CRAWFORD, AND J. W. SCHULZ. 1995. Gray partridge winter home range and use of habitat in North Dakota. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:98-103.
5. CHAMBERLAIN, M. J., B. D. LEOPOLD, AND L. W. BURGER, JR. 2000. Characteristics of roost sites of adult wild turkey females. Journal of Wildlife Management 64:1025-1032.
6. CONNER, L. M., AND B. W. PLOWMAN. 2001. Using Euclidean distances to assess nonrandom habitat use. Pages 275-290 in J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff, editors. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
7. _, M. D. SMITH, AND L. W. BURGER, JR. 2003. A comparison of distance-based and classification-based analyses of habitat use. Ecology 84:526-531.
8. GABOR, T. M., AND E. C. HELLGREN. 2000. Variation in peccary populations: landscape composition or competition by an invader? Ecology 81:2509-2524.
9. GATES, J. E., AND D. R. EVANS. 1998. Cowbird breeding in the central Appalachians: spatial and temporal patterns and habitat selection. Ecological Applications 8:27-40.
10. MANLEY, S. W., J. M. LEE, R. S. FULLER, J. P. CARROLL, AND L. A. BRENNAN. 2000. Comparison of two methods for quantifying northern bobwhite habitat use. National Quail Symposium Proceedings 4:213-218.
11. MANLY, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Second edition. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA.
12. MILLER, D. A., G. A. HURST, AND B. D. LEOPOLD. 1999. Habitat use of eastern wild turkeys in central Mississippi. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:210-222.
13. MLADENOFF, D. J., T. A. SICKLEY, AND A. P. WYDEVEN. 1999. Predicting gray wolf landscape recolonization: logistic regression models vs. new field data. Ecological Applications 9:37-44.
14. NEU, C. W., C. R. BEYERS, AND J. M. PEEK. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:541-545.
15. PENDLETON, G. W., K. TITUS, E. DEGAYNER, C. J. FLATTEN, AND R. E. LOWELL. 1998. Compositional analysis and GIS for study of habitat selection by goshawks in southeast Alaska. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 3:280-295.
16. SAS INSTITUTE. 2001. SAS release 8.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NorthCarolina, USA.