![]() |
Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 170-172
|
'Two week wait' standards for suspected gynaecological malignancy. On target, but missing the point?
a
a
a
|
Author keywords
Gynecological cancer; Postmenopausal bleeding; Rapid access; Referral guidelines; Uterine curettage
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
ARTICLE;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
CONSULTATION;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
FEMALE;
GYNECOLOGIC CANCER;
GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE;
GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY;
HEALTH CARE ACCESS;
HEALTH SERVICE;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HOSPITAL ADMISSION;
HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MEDICAL AUDIT;
OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PELVIS;
POSTMENOPAUSE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
TIME;
UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE;
VAGINA BLEEDING;
VAGINA DISEASE;
ADULT;
AGED;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
FEMALE;
GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
GYNECOLOGY;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK FACTORS;
TIME FACTORS;
WAITING LISTS;
|
EID: 1642554608
PISSN: 13621807
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1258/136218003323010629 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (17)
|
References (6)
|