Accuracy of clinical data in a population based vascular registry

European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 216-219

  Laustsen, Jesper ^a   Jensen, L P ^b   Hansen, A K ^c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Databases; Human; Medical audit; Medical records; Registries; Vascular surgical procedures

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DENMARK; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL PARAMETERS; MEDICAL RECORD; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; RECORDING; REGISTER; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURGEON; SURGICAL WARD; VALIDATION PROCESS; VASCULAR DISEASE; VASCULAR SURGERY;

EID: 1642554467     PISSN: 10785884     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Powsner SM, Wyatt JC, Wright P. Opportunities for and challenges of computerisation. Lancet 1998; 352: 1617-1622.
2. Olsen J, Basso O, Sorensen HT. What is a population-based registry? Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 78.
3. Jensen LP, Schroeder TV, Madsen PV, Lorentzen JE. Vascular registers in Denmark based on personal computers. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1992; 81: 253-256.
4. The Nordic Medico-statistical Committee. NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures. Uppsala and Copenhagen, 2000.
5. Bergqvist D, Troeng T, Elfstrom J, Hedberg B, Ljungstrom KG, Norgren L et al. Auditing surgical outcome: ten years with the Swedish Vascular Registry - Swedvasc. The Steering Committee of Swedvasc. Eur J Surg Suppl 1998; 3-8.
6. Kantonen I, Lepantalo M, Salenius JP, Forsstrom E, Hakkarainen T, Huusari H et al. Auditing a nationwide vascular registry - the 4-year Finnvasc experience, Finnvasc Study Group. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997; 14: 468-474.
7. Lepantalo M, Salenius JP, Luther M, Ylonen K. Introduction of a population-based vascular registry: validity of data and limitations of registration. The Finnvasc Study Group. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 979-981.
8. Barrie JL, Marsh DR. Quality of data in the Manchester orthopaedic database. BMJ 1992; 304: 159-162.
9. Yeoh C, Davies H. Clinical coding: completeness and accuracy when doctors take it on. BMJ 1993; 306: 972.
10. Wyatt JC. Clinical data systems, part 3: development and evaluation. Lancet 1994; 344: 1682-1688.
11. Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1991; 302: 766-768.
12. Nazareth I, King M, Haines A, Rancel L, Myers S. Accuracy of diagnosis of psychosis on general practice computer system. BMJ 1993; 307: 32-34.
13. Fine LG, Keogh BE, Cretin S, Orlando M, Gould MM. How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience. BMJ 2003; 326: 25-28.