Landform Classification for Land Use Planning in Developed Areas: An Example in Segovia Province (Central Spain)

Environmental Management

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 488-498

  Martín Duque, Jose F ^a   Pedraza, Javier ^a   Sanz, Miguel A ^a   Bodoque, José M ^a   Godfrey, Andrew E ^b   Díez, Andrés ^c   Carrasco, Rosa M ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Land classification; Land use territorial planning; Landform mapping; Landscape; Physiography; Segovia; Terrain analysis

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; URBAN PLANNING;

DATA MANAGEMENT; LAND USE PLANNING;

LAND USE;

CLASSIFICATION; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDFORM; PLANNING METHOD;

AUSTRALIA; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GOVERNMENT; LAND USE; REVIEW; RURAL AREA; SPAIN;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GEOLOGY; SPAIN;

CASTILLA Y LEON; EURASIA; EUROPE; SEGOVIA [CASTILLA Y LEON]; SOUTHERN EUROPE; SPAIN;

CASTILLA;

EID: 1642540089     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2848-2     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Aitchison, G. D., and K. Grant. 1968. Terrain evaluation for engineering. Pages 125-146 in G. A. Stewart Eds, Land evaluation. CSIRO-UNESCO Symposium, Macmillan of Australia, Melbourne.
2. Arnot, R. H., and K. Grant. 1981. The application of a method of terrain analysis to functional land-capability assessment and aesthetic landscape appreciation. Landscape Planning 8:269-300.
3. Avers, P. E., D. T. Cleland, W. H. McNab, M. E. Jensen, R. G. Bailey, T. King, C. B. Goudey and W. E. Rusell (1993) National hierarchical framework of ecological units. Unpublished Administrative Paper. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 21 pp.
4. Bailey, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environmental Management (4):365-373.
5. Bailey, R. G., S. C. Zoltai, and E. B. Wiken. 1985. Ecological regionalization in Canada and the United States. Geoforum 16(3):265-275.
6. Beckett, P. H. T., and R. Webster (1969) A review of studies on terrain evaluation by the Oxford-MEXE-Cambridge group, 1960-1969. Report 1123. Military Engineering Experimental Establishment (MEXE), Christchurch, Hants, 36 pp.
7. Bertrand, G. 1968. Paysage et géographie physique globale; esquisse méthodologique. Revue Géographique des Pyrénées et du Sud-Ouest 35:249-272.
8. Bourne, R. 1931. Regional survey and its relation to stocktaking of the agricultural and forest resources of the British Empire. Oxford Forestry Memoirs 13. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 169 pp.
9. Brink, A. B. A., J. A. Mabbutt, R. Webster, and P. H. T. Beckett (1966) Report of the working group of land classification and data storage. Report 940. Military Engineering Experimental Establishment (MEXE), Christchurch, Hants, UK.
10. Cendrero, A. (1996) Propuesta sobre criterios para la clasificación y catalogación del patrimonio geológico. Pages 29-38 in El Patrimonio Geológico. MOPTMA, Madrid.
11. Christian, C. S. (1958) The concept of land units and land systems. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Science Congress Vol. 20:74-81, 1957.
12. Christian, C. S. 1982. The Australian approach to environmental mapping. Pages 298-316. in F. C. Whitmore, and M. E. Williams, Eds. Resources for the twenty-first century. Professional Paper 1193. US Geological Survey, Washington, DC.
13. Christian, C. S., and G. A. Stewart (1968) Methodology of integrated surveys. Proceedings of the Unesco conference on aerial surveys and integrated studies, Toulouse 1964. Paris, pp. 233-280.
14. Fenneman, N. M. 1917. Physiographic divisions of the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 6:19-98.
15. Finlayson, A. A. 1984. Land surface evaluation for engineering practise; applications of the Australian PUCE system for terrain analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology 17(2):149-158.
16. Finlayson, A. A., and A. J. Buckland. 1987. The use of terrain evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pages 67-78. in P.G.D. Whiteside, Eds. The role of geology in urban development. Bulletin 3. Geological Society of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
17. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation). (1976) A framework for land evaluation. Soils Bulletin 32. FAO, Rome, 80 pp.
18. Godfrey, A. E. 1977. A physiographic approach to land use planning. Environmental Geology 2:43-50.
19. Godfrey, A. E., and E. T. Cleaves. 1991. Landscape analysis: theoretical considerations and practical needs. Environmental Geology and Water Sciences 17 (2):141-155.
20. Grant, K., and Finlayson, A. A. (1978) The application of terrain analysis to urban and regional planning. Proceedings of the III International Congress of the International Association for Engineering Geology, 4-8 September 1978, Paris, pp. 79-91.
21. Haase, G. 1964. Landschaftsokölogische detailuntersuchung und naturrāumliche gliederung. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 108:8-30.
22. Hills, G. A. (1961) The ecological basis for natural resources management. The ecological basis for land use planning. Ontario Department of Lands and Forests, Toronto, pp. 8-49.
23. Howard, J. A., and C. W. Mitchell. 1980. Phyto-geomorphic classification of the landscape. Geoforum 11:85-106.
24. Lacate, D. S. (1969) Guidelines for bio-physical land classification. Publication 1264. Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, 58 pp.
25. Linton, D. L. 1951. The delimitation of morphological regions. Pages 199-218. in L. D. Stamp, and S. W. Wooldridge, Eds. London essays in geography. Longman, London.
26. Mabbutt, J. A. 1968. Review of concepts of land classification. Pages 11-27. in G. A. Stewart Eds, Land evaluation. Macmillan of Australia, Melbourne.
27. Meijerink, A. M. J. 1988. Data acquisition and data capture through terrain mapping units. ITC Journal 1:23-44.
28. Milne, G. 1935. Some suggested units of classification and mapping, particularly for east African soils. Soil Research 4(3):183-198.
29. Mitchell, C. W. 1991. Terrain evaluation, 2nd ed. Longman, London 441.
30. Moss, M. R. 1975. Bio-physical land classification schemes: a review of their relevance and applicability to agricultural development in the humid tropics. Journal of Environmental Management 3:287-307.
31. Moss, M. R. 1985. Land processes and land classification. Journal of Environmental Management 20:295-319.
32. Neef, E. 1963. Topologische und chronologische arbeitsweisen in der landschaftsforschung. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 107(4):249-259.
33. Passarge, S. (1919-1920) Die Grundlagen der Landschaftskunde. Friederischen et. Col., Hamburg.
34. Pecsi, M., and S. Somogyi. 1969. Subdivisions and classification of the physiographic landscapes and geomorphological regions of Hungary. Pages 7-24. in B. Sarfalvi, Eds. Research problems in Hungarian applied geography. Akadémiaikiadó, Budapest.
35. Powell, J. W. 1895. Physiographic regions of the United States. National Geographic Society Monograph 1 (3):65-100.
36. Rowe, J. S., and J. W. Sheard. 1981. Ecological land classification; a survey approach. Environmental Management 5(5):451-464.
37. Salisbury, R. T. 1907. Physiography. Henry Holt, New York 770.
38. Sochava, V. B. 1974. Das systemparadigma in ther geographie. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 118:161-166.
39. Solntsev, N. A. 1962. Basic problems in soviet landscape science. Soviet Geography, Review and Translation 3(6):3-15.
40. Stewart, G. A. 1968. Land evaluation. Macmillan of Australia, Melbourne 392.
41. Troll, C. 1950. Die geographische landschaft und ihre erforschung. Studium generale 3, 4/5. Springer-Verlag, Berlin 163-181.
42. UNESCO (1972) Report of consultive meeting of experts on the statistical study of natural hazards and their consequences. SC/WS/500, UNESCO, Paris.
43. Unstead, J. F. 1933. A system of regional geographic. Geography 18:175-187.
44. Van Zuidam, R. A., and F. I. Van Zuidam (1979) Terrain analysis and classification using aerial photographs; a geomorphological approach; chapter 6. ITC textbook of photo-interpretation. Vol. VII. Use of aerial detection in geomorphology and geographical landscape analysis. ITC, Enschede, 305 pp.
45. Veatch, J. O. 1937. The idea of the natural land type. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 2:499-503.
46. Vinogradov, B. V., K. I. Gerenchuk, A. G. Isachenko, K. G. Raman, and Y. N. Teselchuk. 1962. Basic principles of landscape mapping. Soviet Geography, Review and Translations 3(6):15-20.
47. Warrington, G. E., S. G. Leonard, D. Moos, C. Osen, W. E. Russell, E. Sautter (1989) The needs of the users of soil survey information: reliability and methods of presentation. Proceedings of National Cooperative Soil Survey Conference, 24-28 July 1989, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp. 93-129.
48. Warrington, G. E. (1998) Organizing information for natural resource management. http://arww.wecsa.com/Notel/mgmtinfo.html
49. Waters, R. S. 1958. Morphological mapping. Geography 43:10-17.
50. Way, D. S. 1973. Terrain analysis; a guide to site selection using aerial photographic interpretation. Dowden, Hutchison and Ross, Stroudsburg 392.
51. Wertz, W. A., and J. A. Arnold (1972) Land systems inventory. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, Utah, 12 pp.
52. Wooldridge, S. W. 1932. The cycle of erosion and the representation of relief. Scottish Geographical Magazine 48:30-36.
53. Zonneveld, I. S. 1989. The land unit - a fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications. Landscape Ecology 3(2):67-86.