Supplementing Introductory Biology with On-Line Curriculum

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 20-26

  McGroarty, Estelle ^a   Parker, Joyce ^a   Heidemann, Merle ^a   Lim, Heejun ^a   Olson, Mark ^a   Long, Tammy ^a   Merrill, John ^a   Riffell, Samuel ^a   Smith, James ^a   Batzli, Janet ^b   Kirschtel, David ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Curriculum design; On line; Undergraduate biology

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CURRICULUM; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; INTERNET; LEARNING; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHENOTYPE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 1642535377     PISSN: 14708175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bmb.2004.494032010312     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, R. R. Cocking, eds (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
2. W. A. Nelson, D. B. Palumbo (1992) Learning, instruction, and hypermedia, J. Educ. Media. Hypermedia. 1, 287-299.
3. R. Kozma (2000) in Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning (M. Jacobson, R. Kozma, eds) pp. 11-46, Erlbaum, Mahwah.
4. C. T. Fosnot (1996) Theories, Speculation, and the Structure of Knowledge, Teachers College Press, New York.
5. D. H. Jonassen, T. Mayes, R. McAleese (1991) in Designing Environments for Constructive Learning (T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyk, D. H. Jonassen, eds) pp. 231-247, Springer-Verlag, New York.
6. M. Wittrock (1990) Generative processes of comprehension, Educ. Psychol. 24, 345-376.
7. National Science Foundation (1996) Shaping the Future: New Expectations for Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology, pp. 44, National Science Foundation, Washington, DC.
8. A. G. Harrison, D. F. Treagust (1993) Teaching with analogies: A case study in grade-10 optics, J. Res. Sci. Teach. 30, 1291-1307.
9. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, D. R. Krathwohl (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, Edward Bros, Ann Arbor, MI.
10. T. Andre, A. Thieman (1988) Level of adjunct question, type of feed-back, and learning concepts by reading, Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 13, 296-307.
11. R. W. Lewis (1990) Theories, speculation, and the structure of knowledge, Speculat. Sci. Technol. 13, 13-17.
12. N. A. Campbell, J. B. Reece (2002) Biology, 6th Ed, The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park, CA.
13. J. T. Wilson, J. J. Koran (1976) Review of research on mathemagenic behavior: Implications for teaching and learning science, Sci. Educ. 60, 391-400.
14. S. C. Yang (2001) Synergy of constructivism and hypermedia from three constructivist perspectives-Social, semiotic, and cognitive, J. Educ. Comput. Res. 24, 321-361.