Ethics of surgical innovation to treat rare diseases

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 918-919

  Jones, James W ^a   McCullough, Laurence B ^a   Richman, Bruce W ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITEF;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; CASE REPORT; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LEIOMYOMATOSIS; PHLEBOTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RARE DISEASE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VASCULAR SURGERY; VEIN PROSTHESIS; VEIN STRIPPING;

EID: 1642529766     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Strasberg SM, Ludbrook PA. Who oversees innovative practice? Is there a structure that meets the monitoring needs of new techniques? J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:938-48.
2. Frader J, Caniano D. Research and innovation in surgery. In McCullough L, Jones J, Brody B, editors. Surgical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
3. Reitsma AM, Moreno JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:792-801.
4. Tonelli MR, Benditt JO, Albert RK. Clinical experimentation. Lessons from lung volume reduction surgery. Chest 1996;110:230-8.
5. U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington (DC): Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare (US); 1979 Apr. Report No.: (05) 78-0012.
6. Gillett G. Ethics of surgical innovation. Br J Surg 2001;88:897-8.