Determining relationships among yield and yield components using correlation and path coefficient analyses in summer sown common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) genotypes

Pakistan Journal of Botany

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 387-400

  Cakmakci, Sadik ^a   Aydinoglu, Bilal ^a   Karaca, Mehmet ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVES; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; VICIA; VICIA FABA; VICIA SATIVA; VICIA SATIVA SUBSP. NIGRA;

EID: 1642528041     PISSN: 05563321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Acikgoz, E. 2001. Yem Bitkileri. Uludaǧ Üniv. Güçlendirme Vakfi Yayin No. 182. ISBN: 975-564-124-6. Bursa/Turkey.
2. Akanda, S.I., and C.C. Mundt. 1996. Path coefficient analysis of the effects of stripe rust and cultivar mixtures on yield and yield components of winter wheat. Theor. App. Genet., 92: 666-672.
3. Akdag, C. and S. Sehirali. 1992. A research on relations among the characters and path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Tr. J. of Agricultural and Forestry, 16: 763-772.
4. Ayed, M.H., J. Gonzalez, R. Caballero and M.R. Alvir. 2001. Effects of maturity on nutritive value of field-cured hays from common vetch and hairy vetch. Animal Research, 50: 31-42.
5. Ball, R.A., R.W. McNew, E.D. Vories, T.C. Keisling, and L.C. Purcell. 2001. Path analyses of population density effects on short-season soybean yield. Agron. J., 93: 187-195.
6. Berger, J.D., L.D. Robertson and P.S. Cocks. 2002. Agricultural potential of Mediterranean seed and forage legumes: Key differences between and within Vicia species in terms of phenology, yield and agronomy give insight into plant adaptation to semi-arid environments. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 49: 313-325.
7. Boe, A., and J.G. Ross. 1983. Path coefficient analysis of seed yield in big bluestem. J. Range Management, 36: 652-653.
8. Caballero, R., C. Alzueta, L.T. Ortiz, M.L. Rodriguez, C. Barro and A. Rebole. 2001. Carbohydrate and protein fractions of fresh and dried common vetch at three maturity stages. Agron J., 93: 1006-1013.
9. Cakmakci, S. 1992. Variation of some agronomic and morphological traits in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) strains from different origins and relationships between characteristics. Ph.D. Thesis. Uludag Üniversity. Institute of Applied Life Sciences.
10. Cakmakci, S. and E. Açikgöz. 1994. Components of seed and straw yield in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Plant Breeding, 113: 71-74.
11. Cousin, R., A. Massager and A. Vingere. 1985. Breeding for yield in combining peas. The Pea Crops, (Eds.): P.H. Hebblethwaite, M.C. Heath and T.C.K. Dawkins. Butterwords, p. 115-129.
12. Crebert, H. 1934. Betrage zur Züchtung einjahriger Hülsen früchte. 2. f. Pflanzenzüchtung, 19: 526-549.
13. Donaldson, E., W.F. Schillinger and S.M. Dofing. 2001. Straw production and grain yield relationships in winter wheat. Crop Sci., 41: 100-106.
14. Finne, M.A., O.A. Rognli and I. Schjelderup. 2000. Genetic variation in a Norwegian germplasm collection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.): 3. Correlation and path coefficient analyses of agronomic characters. Euphytica, 112: 57-68.
15. Guler, M., M.S. Adak and H. Ulukan. 2001. Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path coefficient analysis in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Europ. J. Agronomy, 14: 161-166.
16. Iannucci, A. and P. Martiniello. 1998. Analysis of seed yield components in four Mediterranean annual clovers. Field Crops Res., 55: 235-243.
17. Iannucci, A., N. Di Fonzo and P. Martiniello. 2002. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seed yield and quality under different forage management systems and irrigation treatments in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crop Res., 78: 65-74.
18. Mueller, T. and K. Thorup-Kristensen. 2001. N-fixation of selected green manure plants in an organic crop rotation. Biol. Agric. Hortic., 18: 345-363.
19. MSTAT-C, 1990. MSTAT users guide: A microcomputer program for the design, management, and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Michigan StateUniversity, East Lansing, Chapter 3.1.1 pp. 3.3-3.7.
20. Phadnis, B.A., A.P. Ekbote and S.S. Ainchwar. 1970. Path coefficient analysis in gram (C. arietinum L.). Field Crops Abs., 25: 1-19.
21. Purcell, L.C., R.A. Ball, J.D. Reaper and E.D. Vories. 2002. Radiation use efficiency and biomass production in soybean at different plant population densities. Crop Sci., 42: 172-177.
22. Ranalli, P. and J.I. Cubero. 1997. Bases for genetic improvement of grain legumes. Field Crop Res., 53: 69-82.
23. Shrivastava, M.K., R.S. Shukla and P.K. Jain. 2001. Path coefficient analysis in diverse genotype of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill). Advances in Plant Science, 14: 47-51.
24. Sinebo, W. 2002. Yield Relationships of barleys grown in a tropical highland environment. Crop Sci., 42: 428-437.
25. Turgut, İ., E. Açikgöz, Z.M. Turan and H. Ekiz. 1995. Relationship between yield and some morphological characters with heritability estimates in common vetch. Tr. J. of Agricultural and Forestry, 19: 367-372.