Comparison with a standard via fully sequential procedures

Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2003, Pages 528-534

  Kim, Seong Hee ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONSTRAINT THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; PROBABILITY; RANDOM NUMBER GENERATION; STANDARDS; SWITCHING;

COMMON RANDOM NUMBERS (CRN); SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURES;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

COMMON RANDOM NUMBERS; COMPARISON WITH A STANDARD; PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE MEASURE; SEQUENTIAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 1642519671     PISSN: 02750708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Boesel, J., B. L. Nelson, and S.-H. Kim. 2002. Using ranking and selection to clean up after a simulation search. Operations Research, forthcoming.
2. Chen, H.-C., C.-H. Chen, L. Dai, and E. Yücesan. 1997. New development of optimal computing budget allocation for discrete event simulation, In Proc. 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. S. Andradóttir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers, and B.L. Nelson, 334-341. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE.
3. Chen, H.-C., C.-H. Chen, and E. Yücesan. 2000. Computing efforts allocation for ordinal optimization and discrete event simulation. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45: 960-964.
4. Chick, S. E. 1997. Selecting the best system: A decision-theoretic approach. In Proc. 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. S. Andradóttir, K. J. Healy, D. H. Withers, and B.L. Nelson, 326-333. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE.
5. Chick, S., and K. Inoue. 2001a. New two-stage and sequential procedures for selecting the best simulated system. Operations Research, 49:1609-1624.
6. Chick, S., and K. Inoue. 2001b. New procedures for identifying the best simulated system using common random numbers. Management Science, 47: 1133-1149.
7. Goldsman, D., and B.L. Nelson. 1998. Comparing Systems via Simulation. In Handbook of simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice, ed. J. Banks, 273-306. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Kim, S.-H. 2002. Comparison with a standard via fully sequential procedures. Technical Reports. School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech.
9. Kim, S.-H., and B. L. Nelson. 2001. A fully sequential procedure for indifference-zone selection in simulation. ACM TOMACS, 11:251-273.
10. Law, A. M., and D. Kelton. 2000. Simulation modeling and analysis, 3rd ed. New York: MCGraw-Hill.
11. Nelson, B. L., and D. Goldsman. 2001. Comparisons with a standard in simulation experiments, Management Science, 47:449-463.
12. Nelson, B. L., J. Swann, D. Goldsman, and W. Song. 2002. Simple procedures for selecting the best simulated system when the number of alternatives is large. Operations Research, 49:950-963.