How important is the size of a reprint order?

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 711-714

  Hopewell, Sally ^a   Clarke, Mike ^a  

^a UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Citation analysis; Publication bias; Reprints

Indexed keywords

CONTROL THEORY; MEDICAL IMAGING; RESEARCH;

CITATIONS; REPRINT ORDER;

HEALTH CARE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG INDUSTRY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 1642506338     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462303000680     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Gil-Montero M, Suci E. Corporate authorship: Problems with current systems for indexing and citation. Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publications, September 14-16, 2001, in Barcelona, Spain.
2. Hoeffel JC, Hoeffel C, Henrot P, Lostette Y. How to assess the value of scientific publications. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996;89:1661-1665.
3. Moore J, Dundee JW. Reprints. Anaesthesia. 1962;17:398.
4. Stern RS, Amdt KA. Classic and near-classic articles in the dermatologic literature. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:948-950.
5. Stryer D, Bero LA. Characteristics of materials distributed by drug companies. An evaluation of appropriateness. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:575-583.
6. Vinson DC. Reprint requests for family medicine literature: How do we respond? Fam Med. 1990;22:404-405.