Repeated follow-up as a method for reducing non-trading behaviour in discrete choice experiments

Social Science and Medicine

Volumn 58, Issue 11, 2004, Pages 2211-2218

  Cairns, John ^a,b   Van Der Pol, Marjon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

Discrete choice; Non trading behaviour; Time preferences

Indexed keywords

DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; TRADE-OFF;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COLLEGE STUDENT; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; COST OF ILLNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 1642504222     PISSN: 02779536     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.021     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cairns J.A., van der Pol M.M. Do people value their own future health differently from others' future health? Medical Decision Making. 19:1999;466-472.
2. Cooper J.C. Optimal bid selection for dichotomous choice contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 24:1993;25-40.
3. Cropper M.L., Aydede S.K., Portney P.R. Rates of time preference for saving lives. American Economic Review. 82:1992;469-472.
4. Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O'Donoghue T. Time discounting and time preference. A critical review Journal of Economic Literature. 40:2002;351-401.
5. Louviere J., Hensher D.A., Swait J. Stated choice methods. Analysis and applications:2000;Cambridge University Press, New York.
6. Mercator Computer Systems Ltd. (2000). SNAP survey software. Bristol: Mercator Computer Systems Ltd.
7. Patton J.H., Stanford M.S., Barratt E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 51:1995;768-774.
8. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. The adaptive decision maker. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. van der Pol M.M., Cairns J.A. Using discrete choice experiments to elicit time preferences for health. Social Science & Medicine. 52:2001;1459-1470.
10. Ryan M., McIntosh E., Dean T., Old P. Trade-offs between location and waiting times in the provision of health care. The case of elective surgery on the Isle of Wight Journal of Public Health Medicine. 22:2000;202-210.
11. Ryan M., San Miguel F. Revisiting the axiom of completeness in health care. Health Economics. 12:2003;295-307.
12. Ryan M., Scott D.A., Reeves C., Bate A., Teijlingen E., van Russell E.M., Napper M., Robb C.M. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare. A systematic review of techniques Health Technology Assessment. 5(5):2001;1-177.
13. Sawtooth Software Inc. (1991). Adaptive conjoint analysis. Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, Sequim.
14. Scott A. Identifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments. An application in health care Journal of Economic Psychology. 23:2002;383-398.