Treatment of penile curvature with Essed-Schröder tunical plication: Aspects of quality of life from the patients' perspective

BJU International

Volumn 93, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 105-108

  Van Der Horst, C ^a   Martinez Portillo F J ^a   Seif, C ^a   Alken, P ^b   Juenemann, K P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Congenital penile deviation; Peyronie's disease; Quality of life; Tunica plication

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; ESSED SCHRODER TUNICAL PLICATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PEYRONIE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; STANDARDIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COITUS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PENILE INDURATION; PENIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1642497579     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.04566.x     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Somers KD, Dawson DM. Fibrin deposition in Peyronie's disease plaque. J Urol 1997; 157: 311-5
2. Friedrich MG, Evans D, Noldus J, Huland H. The correction of penile curvature with the Essed-Schröder technique: a long-term follow-up assessing functional aspects and quality of life. BJU Int 2000; 86: 1034-8
3. Sassine AM, Wespes E, Schulman CC. Modified corporoplasty for penile curvature: 10 years' experience. Urology 1994; 44: 419-21
4. Kelamy A. Congenital penile curvature and its treatment with the Nesbit-Kelamy technique. Br J Urol 1987; 60: 261-3
5. Knispel HH, Gonnermann D, Huland H. Modified surgical technique to correct congenital required penile curvature. Eur Urol 1991; 20: 107-12
6. Nooter RI, Bosch JLHR, Schröder FH. Peyronie's disease and congenital penile curvature: long-term results of operative treatment with plication procedure. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 497-500
7. Manning M, Jünemann KP, Esen T, Alken P. Penile curvature-surgical management with the Schröder-Essed technique. Eur Urol 1998; 33 (Suppl. 1): 165
8. Kelami A. Autophotography in evaluation of functional penile disorders. Urology 1983; 21: 628-9
9. Poulsen J, Kirkeby HJ. Treatment of penile curvature - a retrospective study of 175 patients operated with plication of the tunica albuginea or with Nesbit procedure. Br J Urol 1995; 75: 370
10. Schultheiss D, Meschi MR, Hagemann J, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U. Congenital and acquired penile deviation treated with the Essed plication method. Eur Urol 2000; 38: 167-71
11. Richter S, Shalev M, Nissenkorn I. Correction of congenital or acquired penile curvature through a simple corporoplication technique. Int J Impot Res 1996; 8: 255-8
12. Hauck EW, Bschleipfer T, Diemer T, Manning M, Schroeder-Printzen I, Weidner W. Long-term results of Essed-Schroeder plication by the use of non-absorbable Goretex® sutures for correcting congenital penile curvature. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 146-50
13. Erpenbach K, Rothe H, Derschum W. The penile plication procedure: an alternative method for straightening penile deviation. J Urol 1991; 146: 1276-8
14. Schreiter F. [Surgical therapy of penis shaft induration in congenital penis deviation and induratio penis plastica]. Helv Chir Acta 1991; 58: 243-56
15. Vatne V, Hoeisaeter PA. Functional results after operations of penile curvatures: an institutional experience. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 179 (Suppl.): 151-4
16. Geertsen UA, Brok KE, Andersen B, Nielsen HV. Peyronie curvature treated by plication of the penile fasciae. BJU Int 1996; 77: 733-5
17. van der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Melchior D, Bross S, Alken P, Juenemann KP. Polytetraflouroethylene versus polypropylene sutures in Essed-Schroeder tunical plication. J Urol 2003; 170: 471-5
18. Chien GW, Aboseif SR. Corporeal plication for the treatment of congenital penile curvature. J Urol 2003; 169: 599-602
19. Korman HJ, Sirls LT, Kirkemo AK. Success rate of modified Pereyra bladder neck suspension determined by outcome analysis. J Urol 1992; 152: 1452-7