Differences in heat tolerance between preimplantation embryos from Brahman, Romosinuano, and Angus breeds

Journal of Dairy Science

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 53-58

  Hernandez Ceron J ^a   Chase Jr , C C ^b   Hansen, P J ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

^b USDA ARS SubTropical Agricultural Research Station   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cattle breed; Embryo; Heat shock

Indexed keywords

BOS TAURUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CATTLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETICS; HEAT; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CATTLE; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEAT; PREGNANCY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1642485856     PISSN: 00220302     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73141-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Al-Katanani, Y. M., D. W. Webb, and P. J. Hansen. 1999. Factors affecting seasonal variation in 90 day non-return rate to first service in lactating Holstein cows in a hot climate. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2611-2615.
2. Block, J., C. C. Chase, Jr., and P. J. Hansen. 2002. Inheritance of resistance of bovine preimplantation embryos to heat shock: Relative importance of the maternal versus paternal contribution. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 63:32-37.
3. Ealy, A. D., M. Drost, and P. J. Hansen. 1993. Developmental changes in embryonic resistance to adverse effects of maternal heat stress in cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2899-2905.
4. Edwards, J. L., and P. J. Hansen. 1997. Differential responses of bovine oocytes and preimplantation embryos to heat shock. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 46:138-145.
5. Finch, V. A. 1986. Body temperature in beef cattle: Its control and relevance to production in the tropics. J. Anim. Sci. 62:531-542.
6. Gaughan, J. B., T. L. Mader, S. Holt, M. J. Josey, and K. J. Rowan. 1999. Heat tolerance of Boran and Tuli crossbred steers. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2398-2405.
7. Hammond, A. C., T. A. Olson, C. C. Chase, Jr., E. J. Bowers, R. D. Randel, C. N. Murphy, D. W. Vogt, and A. Tewolde. 1996. Heat tolerance in two tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds, Senepol and Romosinuano, compared with Brahman, Angus and Hereford cattle in Florida. J. Anim. Sci. 74:295-303.
8. Kamwanja, L. A., C. C. Chase, Jr., J. A. Gutierrez, V. J. Guerriero, T. A. Olson, A. C. Hammond, and P. J. Hansen. 1994. Responses of bovine lymphocytes to heat shock as modified by breed and antioxidant status. J. Anim. Sci. 72:438-444.
9. Krininger III, C. E., S. H. Stephens, and P. J. Hansen. 2002. Developmental changes in inhibitory effects of arsenic and heat shock on growth of preimplantation bovine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 63:335-340.
10. Madalena, F. F., A. M. Lemos, R. L. Teodoro, R. T. Barbosa, and J. B. N. Monteiro. 1990. Dairy production and reproduction in Holstein-Friesian and Guzera crosses. J. Dairy Sci. 73:1872-1886.
11. Malayer, J. R., and P. J. Hansen. 1990. Differences between Brahman and Holstein cows in heat-shock induced alterations of protein synthesis and secretion by oviducts and uterine endometrium. J. Anim. Sci. 68:266-280.
12. Parrish, J. J., J. L. Susko-Parrish, E. S. Critser, W. H. Eyestone, and N. L. First. 1986. Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 25:591-600.
13. Paula-Lopes, F. F., C. C. Chase, Jr., Y. M. Al-Katanani, C. E. Krininger III, R. M. Rivera, S. Tekin, A. C. Majewski, O. M. Ocon, T. A. Olson, and P. J. Hansen. 2003. Genetic divergence in cellular resistance to heat shock in cattle: Differences between breeds developed in temperate versus hot climates in responses of preimplantation embryos, reproductive tract tissues and lymphocytes to increased culture temperatures. Reproduction 125:285-294.
14. Primo, A. T. 1990. A South American report, with special reference to criollo cattle. Page 85 in Genetic Conservation of Domestic Livestock. L. Alderson, ed. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
15. Putney, D. J., M. Drost, and W. W. Thatcher. 1988. Embryonic development in superovulated dairy cattle exposed to elevated ambient temperature between days 1 to 7 post insemination. Theriogenology 30:195-209.
16. Rivera, R. M., and P. J. Hansen. 2001. Development of cultured bovine embryos after exposure to high temperatures in the physiological range. Reproduction 121:107-115.
17. Rocha, A., R. D. Randel, J. R. Broussard, J. M. Lim, R. M. Blair, J. D. Roussel, R. A. Godke, and W. Hansel. 1998. High environmental temperature and humidity decrease oocyte quality in Bos taurus but not in Bos indicus cows. Theriogenology 49:657-665.
18. 2α, and the nitric oxide generator, sodium nitroprusside dihydrate, on oocyte maturation and embryonic development in cattle. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 50:263-272.
19. Turner, H. G. 1982. Genetic variation of rectal temperature in cows and its relationship to fertility. Anim. Prod. 35:401-412.