Biological control in support of conservation: Friend or foe?

Experimental Approaches to Conservation Biology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 202-237

  Hoddle, Mark S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1642473618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (164)

1. Anderson, I. 1997. Alarm greets contraceptive virus. New Scientist 154:4.
2. Ankley,G. T.,Tietge, J. E., DeFoe,D. L., Jensen, K. M., Holcombe,G.W., Durhan, E. J., and Diamond, S. A. 1998. Effects of ultraviolet light and methoprene on survival and development of Rana pipiens. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 17:2530-42.
3. Barlow, N. D. 1994. Predicting the effect of a novel vertebrate biocontrol agent: A model for viral-vectored immunocontraception of New Zealand possums. Journal of Applied Ecology 31:454-62.
4. Barlow, N. D., Moller, H., and Beggs, J. R. 1996. A model for the effect of Sphecophaga vesparum vesparum as a biological control agent of the common wasp in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:31-44.
5. Barlow,N. D., and Wratten, S. D. 1996. Ecology of predator-prey and parasitoidhost systems: Progress since Nicholson. In Frontiers of Population Ecology, ed. R. B. Floyd, A.W. Sheppard, and P. J. De Barro, 217-43. Melbourne, Aust.: CSIRO Publishing.
6. Beirne, B. P. 1975. Biological control attempts by introductions against insect pests in the field in Canada. Canadian Entomologist 107:225-36.
7. Beirne, B. P. 1985. Avoidable obstacles to colonization in classical biological control of insects. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:743-47.
8. Bellows, T. S., Jr. 2001. Restoring population balance through natural enemy introductions. Biological Control 21:199-205.
9. Bellows, T. S., Jr., and Fisher, T.W., eds. 1999. Handbook of Biological Control. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
10. Bennett, F. D., and Habeck,D. H. 1992. Cactoblastis cactorum: A successful weed control agent in the Caribbean, now a pest in Florida? In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, ed. E. S. Delfosse and R. R., 21-26. Melbourne, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.
11. Boettner,G. H., Elkinton, J. S., and Boettner, C. J. 2000. Effects of biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of saturniid moths. Conservation Biology 14:1798-806.
12. Booth, R. G., Cross, A. E., Fowler, S. V., and Shaw, R. H. 1995. The biology and taxonomy of Hyperaspis pantherina (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) and the classical biological control of its prey, Orthezia insignis (Homoptera: Ortheziidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 85:307-14.
13. Bright, C. 1998. Life Out of Bounds: Bioinvasion in a Borderless World. New York:W.W. Norton.
14. Buddle, B. M., de Lisle, G.W., McColl, K., Collins, B. J., Morrissy, C., and West-bury, H. A. 1997. Response of the North Island brown kiwi, Apteryx australis mantelli, and the lesser short-tailed bat, Mystacina tuberculata, to a measured dose of rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 45:109-13.
15. Caltagirone, L. E., and Doutt, R. L. 1989. The history of the vedalia beetle importation to California and its impact on the development of biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 34:1-16.
16. Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Center, T. D., Frank, J. H., and Dray, F. A. 1997. Biological control. In Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida, ed.D. Simberloff,D. C. Schmitz, and T. C, Brown, 245-63.Washington,D.C.: Island Press.
18. Charlebois, P. M., Raffenberg, M. J., and Dettmers, J. M. 2001. First occurrence of Cercopagis pengoi in Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27:258-61.
19. Christensen, O. M., and Mather, J. G. 1995. Colonisation by the land planarian Artioposthia triangulata and impact on lumbricid earthworms at a horticultural site. Pedobiologia 39:144-54.
20. Clarke, B., Murray, J., and Johnson, M. S. 1984. The extinction of endemic species by a program of biological control. Pacific Science 38:97-104.
21. Code of conduct for the import and release of exotic biological control agents. 1997. Biocontrol News and Information 18:119N-124N.
22. Colborn,T., Dumanoski,D., and Peterson Myers, J. 1997. Our Stolen Future: Are We Threatening Our Fertility, Intelligence, and Survival? A Scientific Detective Story. New York: Penguin Books.
23. Cook, M. J.W. 1985. A Review of Biological Control of Pests in the Commonwealth Caribbean and Bermuda up to 1982. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau Technical Communication no. 9. Surrey, U.K.: Unwin Brothers.
24. Cornell, H. V., and Hawkins, B. A. 1993. Accumulation of native parasitoid species on introduced herbivores: A comparison of hosts as natives and hosts as invaders. American Naturalist 141:847-65.
25. Cowan, P. E. 1996. Possum biocontrol: Prospects for fertility control. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 8:655-60.
26. Cox, G.W. 1999. Alien Species in North America and Hawaii. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
27. Cullen, J. M., and Delfosse, E. S. 1985. Echium plantagineum: Catalyst for conflict and change in Australia. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, ed. E. S. Delfosse, 249-92. Vancouver, Canada: Agriculture Canada.
28. Davis, C. J., and Butler, G. D. 1964. Introduced enemies of the giant African snail, Achatina fulica Bowdich, in Hawaii (Pulmonta: Achatinidae). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 18:377-89.
29. DeBach, P., ed. 1964. Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. New York: Reinhold Publishing.
30. DeBach, P. 1974. Biological Control by Natural Enemies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. DeLoach, C. J., Gerling, D., Fornasari, L., Sobhian, R., Myartseva, S., Mityaev, I. D., and Lu, Q. G. 1996. Biological control program against salt cedar (Tamarix spp.) in the United States of America: Progress and problems. In Proceedings of the IX International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, ed. V. C. Moran and J. H. Hoffmann, 253-60. Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Cape Town.
32. de Polania, I. Z., and Wilches,O.M. 1992. Impacto ecologico de la hormiga loco, Paratrechina fulva (Mayr), en el municipio de Cimitarra (Santander). Revista Colombiana de Entomología 18:14-22.
33. Diamond, J. M. 1996. A-bombs against amphibians. Nature 383:386-87.
34. Easteal, S. 1981. The history of introductions of Bufo marinus (Amphibia: Anura); a natural experiment in evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 16:93-113.
35. Elliot, N., Kieckhefer, R., and Kauffman, W. 1996. Effects of an invading coccinellid on native coccinellids in an agricultural landscape. Oecologia 105:537-44.
36. Emberson, R. 2000. Endemic biodiversity, natural enemies, and the future of biological control. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, ed. R. Spencer, 875-80. Bozeman: Montana State University.
37. Follett, P. A., Duan, J. J., Messing, R. H., and Jones, V. P. 2000. Parasitoid drift after biological control introductions: Re-examining Pandora's box. American Entomologist 46:82-94.
38. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention. 1996. Code of Conduct for the Import and Release of Exotic Biological Control Agents. International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures, no. 3.
39. Forno, I.W., and Julien, M. H. 2000. Success in biological control of aquatic weeds by arthropods. In Biological Control: Measures of Success, ed. G. Gurr and S. Wratten, 159-87. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. Fowler, S. V., Syrett, P., and Jarvis, P. J. 2000.Will expected and unexpected nontarget effects, and the new Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act, cause biological control of broom to fail in New Zealand? In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds, ed. R. Spencer, 173-86. Bozeman: Montana State University.
41. Frank, J. H. 1998. How risky is biological control? Comment. Ecology 79:1829-34.
42. Frank, J. H. 1999. Bromeliad feeding weevils. Selbyana 20:40-48.
43. Frank, J. H., and Thomas, M. C. 1994. Metamasius callizona (Chevrolat) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), an immigrant pest, destroys bromeliads in Florida. Canadian Entomologist 126:673-82.
44. Freeland,W. J. 1985. The need to control cane toads. Search 16:211-15.
45. Gamradt, S. C., and Kats, L. B. 1996. Effect of introduced crayfish and mosquitofish on California newts. Conservation Biology 10:1155-62.
46. Gassmann, A., and Louda, S. V. 2001. Rhinocyllus conicus: Initial evaluation and subsequent ecological impacts in North America. In Evaluating Indirect Ecological Effects of Biological Control, ed. E.Wajnberg, J. K. Scott, and P. C. Quimby, 147-83.Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing.
47. Goeden, R. D., and Louda, S. 1976. Biotic interference with insects imported for weed biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 21:325-42.
48. Goolsby, J. A., Makinson, J., and Purcell, M. 2000. Seasonal phenology of the gall making fly Fergusonnia sp. (Diptera: Fergusonnidae) and its implications for biological control of Melaleuca quinquenervia. Australian Journal of Entomology 39:336-43.
49. Griffiths,O., Cook, A., and Wells, S.M. 1993. The diet of the introduced carnivorous snail Euglandina rosea in Mauritius and its implications for threatened island gastropod faunas. Journal of Zoology 229:79-89.
50. Gurr, G. M., Barlow, N. D., Memmott, J., Wratten, S. D., and Greathead, D. J. 2000. A history of methodical, theoretical, and empirical approaches to biological control. In Biological Control: Measures of Success, ed. G. Gurr and S. Wratten, 3-37. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
51. Gurr, G., and Wratten, S., eds. 2000. Biological Control: Measures of Success. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
52. Gutierrez, A. P., Caltagirone, L. E., and Meikle,W. 1999. Evaluation of results: Economics of biological control. In Handbook of Biological Control, ed. T. S. Bellows Jr. and T.W. Fisher, 243-52. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
53. Guy, P. L., Webster, D. E., and Davis, L. 1998. Pests of non-indigenous organisms: Hidden costs of introduction. Trends in Evolution and Ecology 13:111.
54. Hall, R.W., and Ehler, L. E. 1979. Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Entomological Society of America Bulletin 25:280-82.
55. Headrick D. H., and Goeden, R. D. 2001. Biological control as a tool for ecosystem management. Biological Control 21:249-57.
56. Heijden, M.G.A., Klironomos, J. N., Ursic, M., Moutoglis, P., Streitwolf-Engel, R., Boller, T.,Wiemken, A., and Sanders, I. R. 1998. Mycorrhizal fungal biodiversity, ecosystem variability, and productivity. Nature 396:69-72.
57. Henneman, M. L., and Memmott, J. 2001. Infiltration of a Hawaiian community by introduced biological control agents. Science 293:1314-16.
58. Hight, S., and Drea, J. J., Jr. 1991. Prospects for a classical biological control project against purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Natural Areas Journal 11:151-57.
59. Hinton, H. E., and Dunn, A.M.S. 1967. Mongooses: Their Natural History and Behaviour. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. Hoddle,M. S. 1999. Biological control of vertebrate pests. In Handbook of Biological Control, ed. T. S. Bellows Jr. and T.W. Fisher, 955-74. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
61. Hokkanen, H., and Pimental, D. 1989. New associations in biological control: Theory and practice. Canadian Entomologist 121:829-40.
62. Holland, R. E. 1993. Changes in planktonic diatoms and water transparency in Hatchery Bay, Bass Island area, western Lake Erie, since the establishment of the zebra mussel. Journal of Great Lakes Research 19:617-24.
63. Holloway, J. K. 1964. Projects in biological control of weeds. In Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds, ed. P. DeBach, 650-70. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation.
64. Holt, R. D., and Hochberg, M. E. 2001. Indirect interactions, community modules, and biological control: A theoretical perspective. In Evaluating Indirect Ecological Effects of Biological Control, ed. E.Wajnberg, J. K. Scott, and P. C. Quimby, 13-37.Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing.
65. Howarth, F. G. 1983. Classical biological control: Panacea or Pandora's box? Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 24:239-44.
66. Howarth, F. G. 1991. Environmental impacts of biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 36:485-509.
67. Howarth, F. G.2000. Non-target effects of biological control agents. In Biological Control: Measures of Success, ed. G. Gurr and S. Wratten, 369-403. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
68. Jaffe,M. 1994. And No Birds Sing:The Story of an Ecological Disaster in a Tropical Paradise. New York: Simon and Schuster.
69. Jetter, K., Klonksy, K., and Pickett, C. H. 1997. A cost/benefit analysis of the ash whitefly biological control program in California. Journal of Arboriculture 23:65-72.
70. Jolly, S. E. 1993. Biological control of possums. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 20:335-39.
71. Jousson, O., Pawlowski, J., Zaninetti, L., Zechman, F.W., Dini, F., Di Guiseppe, G., Woodfield, R., Millar, A., and Meinesz, A. 2000. Invasive alga reaches California. Nature 408:157.
72. Kelly, D., McCallum, K., Schmidt, C. J., and Scanlan, P. M. 1990. Seed predation in nodding and slender winged thistles by nodding thistle receptacle weevil. In Proceedings of the 43rd New Zealand Weed and Pest Control Conference, ed. A. J. Popay, 212-15. Dunedin, New Zealand, n.p..
73. Kiesecker, J. M., Blaustein, A. R., and Miller, C. I. 2001. Transfer of a pathogen from fish to amphibians. Conservation Biology 15:1064-70.
74. King, C. M., ed. 1990a. The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
75. King, C. M. 1990b. Stoat. In The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, ed. C. M. King, 228-312. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
76. King, C. M.1990c.Weasel. In The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, ed. C. M. King, 313-20. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
77. Kinzie, R. A., III. 1992. Predation by the introduced carnivorous snail Euglandina rosea (Ferussac) on endemic aquatic lymnaeid snails in Hawaii. Biological Conservation 60:149-55.
78. Kirkpatrick, J. F., Turner, J.W., Jr., Liu, I.K.M., Fyrer-Hosken, R., and Rutberg, A. T. 1997. Case studies in wildlife immunocontraception: Wild and feral equids and white-tailed deer. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 9:105-10.
79. Krebs, C. J., Boonstra, R., Boutin, S., and Sinclair, A.R.E. 2001. What drives the 10-year cycle of snowshoe hares? BioScience 51:25-35.
80. Krimsky, S. 2000. Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis. Baltimore, Md.: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
81. Kupferberg, S. J. 1997. Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) invasion of a California river: The role of larval competition. Ecology 78:1736-51.
82. Lavers, R. B., and Clapperton, B. K. 1990. Ferret. In The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals, ed. C. M. King, 320-30. Auckland, New Zealand: Oxford University Press.
83. Legner, E. F. 1996. Comments on adverse assessments of Gambusia affinis. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 12:161.
84. Loope, L., Hamann,O., and Stone, C. P. 1988. Comparative conservation biology of oceanic archipelagos. BioScience 38:272-82.
85. Louda, S. M. 2000. Negative ecological effects of the musk thistle biological control agent, Rhinocyllus conicus. In Nontarget Effects of Biological Control, ed. P. A. Follet and J. J. Duan, 215-43. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
86. Louda, S. M., Kendall, D., Connor, J., and Simberloff, D. 1997. Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277:1088-90.
87. Lu,W., and Montgomery,M. E. 2001. Oviposition, development, and feeding of Scymnus (Neopullus) sinuanodulus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): A predator of Adelges tsugae (Homoptera: Adelgidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94:64-70.
88. Lubulwa, G., and McMeniman, S. 1998. ACIAR-supported biological control projects in the South Pacific (1983-1996): An economic assessment. Biocontrol News and Information 19 (3): 91N-98N.
89. Malecki, R. A., Blossey, B., Hight, S. D., Schroeder, D., Kok, L. T., and Coulson, J. R. 1993. Biological control of purple loosestrife. BioScience 43:680-86.
90. McCallum, H. I. 1996. Immunocontraception for wildlife population control. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:491-93.
91. McFadyen, R. 1997. Protocols and quarantine procedures for importation and release of biological control agents. In Biological Control of Weeds: Theory and Practical Application, ed. M. Julien and G. White, 63-69. Canberra, Australia: ACIAR Monograph Series.
92. McFadyen, R. 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 43:369-93.
93. Medal, J. C.,Vitorino,M. D., Habeck,D. H., Gillmore, J. L., Pedrosa, J. H., and De Sousa, L. P. 1999. Host specificity of Heteroperreyia hubrichi Malaise (Hymenoptera: Pergidae), a potential biological control agent of Brazilian peppertree (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi). Biological Control 14:60-65.
94. Meinesz, A. 1999. Killer Algae: The True Tale of a Biological Invasion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
95. Meisch, M. V. 1985. Gambusia affinis affinis. In Biological Control of Mosquitoes, ed. H. C. Chapman, 3-17. American Mosquito Control Association, bull. no. 6, American Mosquito Control Association, Fresno, Calif.
96. Memmott, J., Fowler, S. V., and Hill, R. L. 1998. The effect of release size on the probability of establishment of biological control agents: Gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) released against gorse (Ulex europaeus) in New Zealand. Biocontrol Science and Technology 8:103-15.
97. Murray, J., Murray, E., Johnson, M. S., and Clarke, B. 1988. The extinction of Partula on Moorea. Pacific Science 42:150-53.
98. Nagler, J. J., Bouma, J., Thorgaard, G. H., and Dauble,D. D. 2001. High incidence of a male-specific genetic marker in phenotypic female Chinook salmon from the Columbia River. Environmental Health Perspectives 109:67-69.
99. Nechols, J. R., Kauffman,W. C., and Schaefer, P.W. 1992. Significance of host specificity in classical biological control. In Selection Criteria and Ecological Consequences of Importing Natural Enemies, ed.W. C. Kauffman and J. R. Nechols, 41-52. Lanham, Md.: Entomological Society of America.
100. Newsome, A. 1990. The control of vertebrate pests by vertebrate predators. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:187-91.
101. Nicholson, A. J., and Bailey,V. A. 1935. The balance of animal populations. Part I. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 3:551-98.
102. Norgaard, R. B. 1988. Economics of the cassava mealybug (Phaenacoccus manihoti; Hom.: Pseudococcidae) biological control program in Africa. Entomophaga 33:3-6.
103. Obrycki, J. J., Elliot, N. C., and Giles, K. L. 2000. Coccinellid introductions: Potential for and evaluation of nontarget effects. In Nontarget Effects of Biological Control, ed. P. A. Follet and J. J. Duan, 127-45. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
104. Ogle, C. C., Cock, G.D.L., Arnold, G., and Mickleson, N. 2000. Impact of an exotic vine Clematis vitalba (F. Ranunculaceae) and of control measures on plant biodiversity in indigenous forest, Taihape, New Zealand. Australian Ecology 25:539-51.
105. Onstad,D.W., and McManus,M. L. 1996. Risks of host range expansion by parasites of insects. BioScience 46:430-35.
106. Oogjes, G. 1997. Ethical aspects and dilemmas of fertility control of unwanted wildlife: An animal welfarist's perspective. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 9:163-67.
107. Park, D., Hempleman, S. C., and Propper, C. R. 2001. Endosulfan exposure disrupts pheromonal systems in the red spotted newt: A mechanism for subtle effects of environmental chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives 109:669-73.
108. Pelley, J. 1997. Deformities in Minnesota frogs linked to water in new study. Environmental Science and Technology 31 (12): 552A.
109. Pemberton, R.W. 1995. Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in the United States: An immigrant biological control agent or an introduction of the nursery trade? American Entomologist 41:230-32.
110. Pickett, C. H., Ball, J. C., Casanave, K. C., Klonksy, K., Jetter, K. M., Bezark, L. G., and Schoenig, S. E. 1996. Establishment of the ash whitefly parasitoid Encarsiainaron (Walker) and its economic benefits to ornamental\ street trees in California. Biological Control 6:260-72.
111. Pimm, S. L. 1987. The snake that ate Guam. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:293-95.
112. Relyea, R. A., and Mills, N. 2001. Predator-induced stress makes the pesticide carbaryl more deadly to gray treefrog tadpoles (Hyla versicolor). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:2491-96.
113. Robinson G. S. 1975. Macrolepidoptera of Fiji and Rotuma. Oxon, U.K.: Farringdon Classey.
114. Rodda, G. H., Fritts, T. H., and Chiszar, D. 1997. The disappearance of Guam's wildlife. BioScience 47:565-74.
115. Roderick, G. K. 1992. Postcolonization evolution of natural enemies. In Selection Criteria and Ecological Consequences of Importing Natural Enemies, ed.W. C. Kauffman and J. E. Nechols, 71-86. Lanham, Md.: Entomological Society of America.
116. Rodger, J. C. 1997. Likely targets for immunocontraception in marsupials. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 9:131-36.
117. Room, P. M. 1990. Ecology of a simple plant-herbivore system: Biological control of Salvinia. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5:74-79.
118. Room, P. M., Harley, K.L.S., Forno, I.W., and Sands D.P.A. 1981. Successful biological control of the floating weed Salvinia. Nature 294:78-80.
119. Room, P. M., and Thomas, P. A. 1985. Nitrogen and establishment of a beetle for biological control of the floating weed Salvinia in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Applied Ecology 22:139-56.
120. Roush, R. T. 1990. Genetic variation in natural enemies: Critical issues for colonization in biological control. In Critical Issues in Biological Control, ed. M. MacKauer, L. E. Ehler, and J. Roland, 263-88. Andover, U.K.: J. Intercept.
121. Rupp, H. R. 1996. Adverse assessments of Gambusia affinis: An alternate view for mosquito control practitioners. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association 12:155-66.
122. Sailer, R. I. 1978. Our immigrant insect fauna. Entomological Society of America Bulletin 24:3-11.
123. Salas, J., and Frank, J. H. 2001. Development of Metamasius callizona (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on pineapple stems. Florida Entomologist 84:123-26.
124. Sands, D.P.A. 1997. The safety of biological control agents: Assessing their impact on beneficial and other non target hosts. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56:611-16.
125. Saunders, G., Coman, B., Kinnear, J., and Braysher, M. 1995. Managing Vertebrate Pests: Foxes. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.
126. Savidge, J. A. 1987. Extinction of an island forest avifauna by an introduced snake. Ecology 68:660-68.
127. Sawyer, R. C. 1996. To Make a Spotless Orange: Biological Control in California. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
128. Schettler, T., Soloman, G., Valenti, M., and Huddle, A. 1999. Generations at Risk: Reproductive Health and the Environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.
129. Secord, D., and Kareiva, P. 1996. Perils and pitfalls in the host specificity paradigm. BioScience 46:448-53.
130. Simberloff, D., Schmitz, D. C., and Brown, T. C., eds. 1997. Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida.Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
131. Simberloff, D., and Stiling, P. 1996. Risks of species introduced for biological control. Biological Conservation 78:185-92.
132. Simberloff, D., and Stiling, P. 1998. How risky is biological control? Reply. Ecology 79:1834-36.
133. Simmonds, F. J., and Hughes, I.W. 1963. Biological control of snails exerted by Euglandina rosea (Ferrussac) in Bermuda. Entomophaga 8:219-22.
134. Sinclair, A.R.E., Olsen, P. D., and Redhead, T. D. 1990. Can predators regulate small mammal populations? Evidence from house mouse outbreaks in Australia. Oikos 59:382-92.
135. Singer, P. 1997. Neither human nor natural: Ethics and feral animals. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 9:157-62.
136. Smith, H. S. 1919. On some phases of insect control by the biological method. Journal of Economic Entomology 12:288-92.
137. Smith, H. S.1935. The role of biotic factors in the determination of population densities. Journal of Economic Entomology 28:873-98.
138. Souder, W. 2000. A Plague of Frogs: The Horrifying True Story. New York: Hyperion.
139. Stiling, P. 1990. Calculating the establishment rates of parasitoids in classical biological control. American Entomologist 36:225-30.
140. Stiling, P., and Simberloff, D. 2000. The frequency and strength of nontarget effects of invertebrate biological control agents of plant pests and weeds. In Nontarget Effects of Biological Control, ed. P. A. Follet and J. J. Duan, 31-43. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
141. Strand, M. R., and Obrycki, J. J. 1996. Host specificity of insect parasitoids and predators. BioScience 46:422-29.
142. Strong, D. R. 1997. Fear no weevil? Science 277:1058-59.
143. Strong,D. R., and Pemberton, R.W. 2001. Food webs, risks of alien enemies, and reform of biological control. In Evaluating Indirect Ecological Effects of Biological Control, ed. E. Wajnberg, J. K. Scott, and P. C. Quimby, 57-79. Wallingford, U.K.: CABI Publishing.
144. Sutherst, R.W., Floyd, R. B., and Maywald, G. F. 1995. The potential geographical distribution of the cane toad, Bufo marinus L. in Australia. Conservation Biology 9:294-99.
145. Sutherst, R.W., and Maywald, G. F. 1985. A computerized system for matching climates in ecology. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 13:281-99.
146. Syrett, P., Briese, D. T., and Hoffmann, J. H. 2000. Success in biological control of terrestrial weeds by arthropods. In Biological Control: Measures of Success, ed. G. Gurr and S. Wratten, 189-230. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
147. Syrett, P., Smith, L. A., Bourner, T. C., Fowler, S. V., and Wilcox, A. 2000. A European pest to control a New Zealand weed: Investigating the safety of heather beetle, Lochmaea suturalis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) for biological control of heather, Culluna vulgaris. Bulletin of Entomological Research 90:169-78.
148. Tenner, E. 1996.Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Knopf.
149. Todd, K. 2001. Tinkering with Eden: A Natural History of Exotics in America. New York:W.W. Norton.
150. Tothill J. D., Taylor T.H.C., and Paine R.W. (1930). The Coconut Moth in Fiji:A History of Its Control by Means of Parasites. London,U.K.: Imperial Bureau of Entomology.
151. Tyndale-Biscoe, C. H. 1995.Vermin and viruses: Risks and benefits of viral-vectored immunosterilization. Search 26:239-44.
152. Van Driesche, R. G. 1994. Classical biological control of environmental pests. Florida Entomologist 77:20-33.
153. Van Driesche, R. G., and Bellows, T. S., Jr. 1993. Steps in Classical Arthropod Biological Control. Lanham, Md.: Entomological Society of America.
154. Van Driesche, R. G., and Bellows, T. S., Jr. 1996. Biological Control. New York: Chapman and Hall.
155. Van Driesche, R. G., Heard,T., McClay, A., and Reardon, R. 1999. Proceedings of Session: Host Specificity Testing of Exotic Arthropod Biological Control Agents-The Biological Basis for Improvement in Safety. Morgantown, W.Va.: USDA Forest Service Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team.
156. Van Driesche, R. G., and Hoddle,M. S. 1997. Should arthropod parasitoids and predators be subject to host range testing when used as biological control agents? Agriculture and Human Values 14:211-26.
157. Van Driesche, R. G., and Hoddle,M. S. 2000. Arthropod biological control: Measuring success step by step. In Biological Control: Measures of Success, ed. G. Gurr and S. Wratten, 39-75. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
158. Van Driesche, J., and Van Driesche, R. 2000. Nature Out of Place: Biological Invasions in a Global Age.Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
159. Vitousek, P. M., D'Antonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., and Westbrooks, R. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84:468-78.
160. Walton,W. E., and Mulla, M. S. 1991. Integrated control of Culex tarsalis larvae using Bacillus sphaericus and Gambusia affinis: Effects on mosquitoes and nontarget organisms in field mesocosms. Bulletin of the Society of Vector Ecology 16:203-21.
161. Williams, C. K. 1997. Development and use of virus-vectored immunocontraception. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development 9:169-78.
162. Williamson, M., and Fitter, A. 1996. The varying success of invaders. Ecology 77:1661-66.
163. Wilson, E. O. 1997. Foreword. In Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida, ed. D. Simberloff, D. C. Schmitz, and T. C. Brown, ix-x.Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
164. Withers, T. M., Browne, L. B., and Stanley, J. 1999. Host Specificity Testing in Australasia: Towards Improved Assays for Biological Control. Coorparo, Queensland: The State of Queensland, Department of Natural Resources.