Guidelines for long-term monitoring protocols

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1000-1003

  Oakley, Karen L ^a,c,d,e,f,g   Thomas, Lisa P ^b,h,i,j,k   Fancy, Steven G ^b,c,d,l,m,n  

^a United States Geological Survey   (United States)

^b NATIONAL PARK SERVICE   (United States)

^c U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

^e EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^f Denali National Park and Preserve   (United States)

^g U States Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^h S CO Plateau Inventory M   (United States)

ⁱ INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j MISSOURI SOUTHERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k Prairie Cluster Prototype M ^*  (United States)

^l HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m U States Fish Wildl Serv   (United States)

ⁿ U S FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Format; Guidelines; Monitoring; National park; Natural resources; Policy; Protocol; Sampling

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION PLANNING; GUIDELINE; MONITORING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 1642465374     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. BEARD, G. R., W. A. SCOTT, AND J. K. ADAMSON. 1999. The value of consistent methodology in long-term environmental monitoring. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 54: 239-258.
2. COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES. 1997. Integrating the Nation's environmental monitoring and research networks and programs. A proposed framework. United States National Science and Technology Council, Washington, D.C., USA.
3. ELZINGA, C. L., D. W. SALZER, AND J. W. WILLOUGHBY. 1998. Measuring and monitoring plant populations. Bureau of Land Management, Technical Reference 1730-1, Denver, Colorado, USA.
4. GEOGHEGAN, P. 1996. The management of quality control and quality assurance systems in fisheries science. Fisheries 21: 14-18.
5. GEOGHEGAN, P., M. T. MATTSON, D. J. DUNNING, AND Q. E. ROSS. 1990. Improved data in a tagging program through quality assurance and quality control. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7: 714-719.
6. NEWELL, A. D., AND M. L. MORRISON. 1993. Use of overlap studies to evaluate methods changes in water chemistry protocols. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 67: 433-456.
7. PEITZ, D. G., S. G. FANCY, L. P. THOMAS, AND B. WITCHER. 2003. Bird monitoring protocol for Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, Nebraska and Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve, Kansas. National Park Service, Prairie Cluster prototype monitoring program, Springfield, Missouri, USA.
8. SHAMPINE, W. J. 1993. Quality assurance and quality control in monitoring programs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 26: 143-151.
9. WIERINGA, D., C. MOORE, AND V. BARNES. 1998. Procedure writing, principles and practices. Second edition. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA.