Wetland Mitigation Compliance in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan

Environmental Management

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 535-540

  Hornyak, Melissa M ^a   Halvorsen, Kathleen E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Regulatory compliance; State assumption; Wetland mitigation

Indexed keywords

MONITORING; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE; WETLANDS;

MITIGATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

COMPLIANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HABITAT CONSERVATION; REGULATORY APPROACH; WETLAND;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LAW ENFORCEMENT; REVIEW; RURAL AREA; UNITED STATES; WETLAND;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DOCUMENTATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENGINEERING; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; MICHIGAN; WATER SUPPLY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1642459213     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-2851-7     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Dahl, T. E. 1990. Wetlands losses in the United States: 1780's to 1980's. United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. Jamestown, MD: Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/wetloss/wetloss/htm (version 16Jul97).
2. Dahl, T. E., and Allord, G.J. 1994. History of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States. Part of the National Water Summary on Wetland Resources. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC.
3. Esseks, J. D., and S. E. Kraft. 1993. Midwestern farmers' perception of monitoring for conservation compliance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 48 (5):458-466.
4. Frank, N., and M. Lombness. 1988. Gaining regulatory compliance: law enforcement and power in an interactionist perspective, Administration and Society 20(1):71-91.
5. Gaddie, R. K., and J. L. Regens. 2000. Regulating wetlands protection: environmental federalism and the states. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York 155 pp.
6. Goodenough, M. 1995. Public participation in a state-assumed wetlands permit program: the Michigan example. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 10:224-283,
7. Hornyak, M. M. (2001) Wetlands Permitting in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan: A Study of Mitigation and Monitoring, Unpublished Masters Thesis. Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan.
8. Johnson, P. A., Mock, D. L. Teachout, E. J. and McMillan, A. 2000. Washington State wetland mitigation evaluation study - phase 1: compliance, Washington State Department of Ecology Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program, Lacey, Washington, Publication 00-06-016.
9. Kentula, M. E., J. C. Sifneos, J. W. Good, M. Rylko, and K. Kunz. 1992. Trends and patterns in Section 404 permitting requiring compensatory mitigation in Oregon and Washington, USA. Environmental Management 16(1):109-119.
10. MDEQ (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality). 1999. Administrative Rules for Wetlands Protection, under Part 303 Wetland Protection, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, Most recent amendments effective 27, April 2000.
11. MDEQ (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality). 2000. Fiscal year 2000-2001 MDEQ resource guide.http://www.deq.state.mi.us/fbsd/2001ResourceGuide.htm.
12. MDEQ (Michigan Department of Environmental Quality), 2001, Michigan wetland mitigation and permit compliance study, final report. Land and Water Management Division, http://www.deq.state.mi.us/lwm/grt_lakes/wetlands/mitstudy.html.
13. Scholz, J. T. 1984, Voluntary compliance and regulatory enforcement. Law and Policy October:385-403.
14. WaterShedds, A 1999. Decision Support System for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. 1999, Successful mitigation. North Carolina State University Water Quality Group. http://h20sparc.wq.ncsu.edu/info/wetlands/mitsucc.html.