An inventory-based carbon budget for forest and woodland ecosystems of Turkey

Journal of Environmental Monitoring

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 26-30

  Evrendilek, Fatih ^a  

^a MUSTAFA KEMAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; DATA BASE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FOREST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOURCE SINK RELATIONSHIP; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

ATMOSPHERE; CARBON; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; TREES; TURKEY;

NES;

EID: 1642458159     PISSN: 14640325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b309893a     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. F. T. Mackenzie, L. M. Ver and A. Lerman, Chem. Geol., 2002, 190, 13-32.
2. M. K. Wali, F. Evrendilek, T. West, S. Watts, D. Pant, H. Gibbs and B. McClead, Nat. Resour., 1999, 35, 20-33.
3. D. S. Schimel, Global Change Biol., 1995, 1, 77-91.
4. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, FAO Forestry Paper No.: 140, Rome, 2001.
5. R. K. Dixon, S. Brown, R. A. Houghton, A. M. Solomon, M. C. Trexler and J. Wisniewski, Science, 1994, 263, 185-190.
6. S. Brown, Environ. Pollut., 2002, 116, 363-372.
7. R. A. Houghton, Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850-2000, Tellus, 2003, B55(2), 378-390.
8. J. Y. Fang and Z. M. Wang, Ecol. Res., 2001, 16, 587-592.
9. M. Duzgun and E. Ozu-Urlu, Forest and Forestry Policy Development in Turkey, Country Report, Cairo, 2000.
10. Z. Kaya and D. J. Raynal, Biol Conserv., 2001, 97, 131-141; M. Boydak, Special Environment Issue of Atlas, 1999, 2, 24-31.
11. Z. Kaya and D. J. Raynal, Biol Conserv., 2001, 97, 131-141; M. Boydak, Special Environment Issue of Atlas, 1999, 2, 24-31.
12. Z. Kaya, E. Kun and A. Guner, National Plan for In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity in Turkey, National Report to the Ministry of Environment, Ankara (in Turkish), 1997.
13. D. D. Sharp, H. Lieth and D. Whigham, Assessment of Regional Productivity in North Carolina, in Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, ed. H. Lieth and R. H. Whittaker, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1975.
14. S. Brown and A. E. Lugo, Science, 1984, 223, 1290-1293.
15. P. E. Kauppi, K. Mielikainen and K. Kusela, Science, 1992, 256, 70-74.
16. D. P. Turner, G. J. Koepper, M. E. Harmon and J. J. Lee, Ecol. Appl., 1995, 5, 421-436.
17. UN-ECE/FAO, Forest Resources of Europe, CIS, North America, Australia, Japan and New Zealand: Contribution to The Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000, Geneva Timber and Forest Study papers No.: 17, Rome, 2000.
18. F. Evrendilek and H. Doygun, Environ. Manage., 2000, 26, 479-489.
19. K. Isik, Z. Kaya and I. Atalay, Biodiversity Action Plan for Turkey: Forest Ecosystems, Ankara, 1995.
20. E. Kun, O. Bakir, T. Tukel and A. Demirsoy, Biodiversity Action Plan for Turkey: Steppe Ecosystems, Ankara, 1996.
21. 2 in the above-ground biomass of the forests in Turkey and Bulgaria in the recent decades, in Proceedings of 11th World Forestry Congress, Antalya, Turkey, vol. 3, pp. 131-138.
22. S. W. Running and S. T. Gower, Tree Physiol., 1991, 9, 147-160.
23. K. Kramer and G. M. J. Mohren, Long-term Effects of Climate Change on Carbon Budgets of Forests in Europe, Alterra-report 194, Wageningen, 2001.
24. T. Karjalainen, A. Pussinen, J. Liski, G. J. Nabuurs, T. Eggers, T. Lapveteläinen and T. Kaipainen, Scenario analysis of the impacts of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget, Forest Policy Econ., 2003, 5(2), 141-155.
25. E. Matthews, J. Geophys. Res., 1997, 102, 18771-18800.
26. D. L. DeAngelis, R. H. Gardner and H. H. Shugart, Productivity of Forest Ecosystems Studied During the IBP: The Woodlands Data Set, in Dynamics of Forest Ecosystems, ed. D. E. Reichle, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1981.
27. G. J. Nabuurs and M. J. Schelhaas, Biomass Bioenergy, 2003, 24, 311-320.