The effect of different 'pass-fail' criteria on the results of a newborn hearing screening program

ORL

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 250-253

  Korres, Stavros ^a,b   Balatsouras, Dimitrios ^b,c,d   Ferekidis, Eleftherios ^a   Gkoritsa, Eleni ^a   Georgiou, Anastasia ^a,b   Nikolopoulos, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b IASO   (Greece)

^c TZANEIO GENERAL HOSPITAL OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

^d NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Hearing loss; Newborn hearing screening; Otoacoustic emissions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; NEWBORN; NEWBORN SCREENING; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 1642455847     PISSN: 03011569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000075221     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR: Universal newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Results of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project. Semin Hear 1993;14:18-27.
2. Vohr BR, Carty LM, Moore PE, Letourneau K: The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993-1996). J Pediatr 1998;133:353-357.
3. National Consortium for Newborn Hearing Screening: TEOAE-based universal newborn hearing screening. Washington, Georgetown University School of Medicine, November 16-18, 1995.
4. Norton SJ, Vohr BR, Widen JE, Cone-Wesson B, Sininger YS, Gorga MP, Folsom RC: Transient otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear Hear 2000;21:425-442.
5. Prieve B, Stevens F: The New York State Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Demonstration Project: Introduction and overview. Ear Hear 2000;21:85-91.
6. Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Trial Group: Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet 1998;352:1957-1964.
7. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing: Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol 2000;9:9-29.
8. Korres S, Balatsouras D, Economou C, Ferekidis E, Kandiloros D, Adamopoulos G: Effect of the number of averaged responses in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions on the results of neonatal hearing screening. Audiology 2000;39:1-7.
9. Meredith R, Stephens D, Hogan S, Cartridge PHT, Drayton M: Screening for hearing loss in an at-risk neonatal population using evoked otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1994;23:187-193.
10. Watkin PM: Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1996;74:F16-F25.
11. Huynh MT, Pollack RA, Cunningham RAJ: Universal newborn hearing screening feasibility in a community hospital. J Fam Pract 1996;42:487-490.
12. Stevens JC, Webb HD, Hutchinson J, Connell J, Smith MF, Buffin JT: Click evoked otoacousic emissions in neonatal screening. Ear Hear 1990;11:128-133.
13. Lutman ME, Davis AC, Fortnum HM, Wood C: Field sensitivity of targeted neonatal hearing screening by transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1997;18:265-276.
14. Spivak L, Dalzell L, Berg A, Bradley M, Cacace A, Campbell D, DeCristofaro J, Gravel J, Greenberg E, Gross S, Orlando M, Pinheiro J, Regan J, Stevens F, Prieve B: The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: Inpatient and outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000;21:92-103.